Written and Published by:
Ian Sinclair
5 Ivy Street
(02) 808 3691

Copyright lan Sinclair 1992 | ISBN 0-646-08812-2

Copies of this book can be obtained by writing to lan Sinclair at the above address.

Below is Chapter 11 of Ian Sinclair’s essential Book, “Vaccination -The Hidden Facts”


Page #

Chapter 1 Did Vaccines Really Save Us? 3
Chapter 2 The True Reasons for the Decline in Infectious Diseases  12
Chapter 3 Vaccines – How Safe and Effective?   17
Chapter 4 Vaccination Condemned  53
Chapter 5 The Vaccination Theory – Fact or Fallacy?  57
Chapter 6 The Germ Theory Exposed   61
Chapter 7 Toxemia – The Basic Cause of Disease   64
Chapter 8 The True Nature of Disease   68
Chapter 9 Orthodox Medicine or Natural Health   75
Chapter 10 The Case Against Vaccination   84
Chapter 11 Why Vaccination Continues   86
Chapter 12 Health – The Only Immunity  96
Appendix A:  Cot Death & Vaccination Link   
  About the Author and Son    




“The propaganda in favour of immunization has won the minds of the masses and has influenced medical thinking, and government and international measures, relating to disease control. This has been at the expense of methods which might have raised the real level of well-being of the people at risk. This begins to impinge upon the realms of politics and economics, for the gains are great in this area, and the truth is not always palatable. The removal of the idea of protection, via immunization, and the implementation of expensive measures to improve nutrition in countries which can hardly make ends meet, would not be welcome themes for politicians, even if they could be made to listen to the facts.

Leon Chaitow
Vaccination And Immunization

That vaccination continues to this day is not because of its ‘assumed’ benefits, but (1) because it yields millions of dollars profit to the Drug Industry, (2) because it is one of the foundation stones of Medical Science upon which they have undeservedly built their power and prestige, and for that reason, must remain in place, and (3) because the majority of the public, brainwashed by medical propaganda, and unwilling to think for themselves, blindly accept it.


Firstly, commercial interests are a major motive behind the vaccine drive, netting the drug industry millions of dollars annually. Eleanor McBean PhD (The Poisoned Needle) states:

“The vaccine business has continued to thrive in spite of its disastrous failure, for the mere reason that it nets millions of dollars for the promoters, and this buys power with governments and propaganda control over the masses who don’t know how to think for themselves”.

Speaking of the disastrous smallpox epidemics in England following compulsory vaccination, Herbert Shelton (Natural Hygiene, Man’s Pristine Way of Life) stated that smallpox vaccinations were kept alive only because of the enormous profits that were derived from this practice.

Despite the failure of the tuberculosis vaccine in India involving over 260,000 Indians, both the World Health Organization and the Indian government recommended its continuance. One may speculate as to the reasons why but its worth noting that the World Health Organization is sponsored by none other than the American Drug Trust. A conflict of interests perhaps?

The Journal of the American Medical Association, November 14th 1990, contains an article titled, British Firm Halts Vaccine Manufacture”. The Wellcome Company, Beckenham, England were forced to cease vaccine production. The reasons cited by the head of their Biotech Division, Dr A J Beale were “Too much litigation and too little profit”.

George Starr White M.D. of Los Angeles, probably best summed it up with this comment:

“Take all the profit out of manufacturing and administration of serums and vaccines and they would soon be condemned, even by those who are now using them”.


Secondly, the medical profession, hell bent on preserving its power and prestige, cannot afford to have the public ever finding out the truth about vaccination. This is not to condemn all doctors, for many simply do not know the truth, whilst many others do not want to know. Yet medical hierarchy, intent on maintaining the ‘status-quo’, feeds the public a constant stream of propaganda promoting the case for vaccination. This propaganda, designed to convince people of the value and importance of vaccinations, takes the form of falsified statistics, misleading statements, public scare campaigns and in many cases, downright lies!

Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics!

Albert Einstein once said that there were three types of lies–lies, damned lies and statistics! It is easy to provide statistical evidence which creates the impression that vaccination works. Here is a good example which appears in the book, Communicable Diseases Handbook by L. Claire Bennett and Sarah Searl from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver. On Page 44 it states: “An effective inoculation program should obviously result in a lowered incidence of the particular disease under surveillance. For instance, since 1963 there have been more than 80 million doses of red measles vaccine given. The number of reported cases has gone from a pre-1963 total of about 500,000 to a total of about 35,000 in 1975”. Now this suggests that the vaccine was indeed responsible for this decline, that is until we go back to 1958 and learn that the number of cases was 800,000! In other words, measles cases were in decline before the 1963 vaccine commenced. (In fact by 1955, still eight years before the start of this vaccine, there had been a 97% decline in the death rate from measles since the turn of the century!) What is more, medical authorities have since acknowledged that the 1963 measles vaccine was a complete failure!

This same scenario occurs with graphical evidence also.

An examination of Graph 1 suggests that measles vaccine was responsible for the decline, but if we examine Graph 2 and go back to 1900, we can clearly see that the major part of the decline had already occurred and that the commencement of vaccination had no impact on the rate of decline thereafter. If you happen to visit a medical library and examine some of the texts and medical journals, you will find that most graphical evidence on the decline of infectious disease starts from the year 1940 when antibiotics and certain vaccinations commenced. Such graphs always present a misleading picture. Is it any wonder that most doctors believe in drug therapy and vaccinations? They have never seen the whole picture. In the Natural Health magazine, July 1988, an article appeared on Vaccination Therapy, in which the author, Shirley Lewis, mentioned this very point. Ms Lewis spoke of a doctor who undertook her own research by consulting relevant material in the medical library. As Ms Lewis points out, “She showed us a graph, from a medical journal, that proved how effective antibiotics and immunization had been in eradicating scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles. But this doctor’s copy of the graph started in 1940, and we had already seen the fuller graph, which started in 1850 and showed that in all four diseases, a steady decline had been happening long before the introduction of either immunization or antibiotics. So that doctor had made a conscientious decision based on a graph that had been deliberately falsified”. This explains the comments of Dr Lancaster (Medical Journal of Australia Nov 1967): “Misconceptions on the importance of direct medical and surgical intervention in the progress of mortality are widely held by historians, statisticians and medical theorists”.

There are several other ways that statistics can be manipulated or falsified in order to create the impression that vaccines work. A common and well used technique is to ‘re-diagnose’. This means that if a patient presents the characteristic symptoms of a particular disease, yet has already been vaccinated against that disease, the doctor will diagnose something else. The National Anti-Vaccination League in Britain provides evidence of this in much of its literature. For example, chicken pox, according to medical authorities is a non-fatal disease. Yet, “In the thirty years ending in 1934, 3,112 people are stated to have died of chicken pox in England and Wales”. The truth is that these people actually died of smallpox against which they had been previously vaccinated. Because of their vaccine status, however, their deaths were recorded as chicken pox. According to The Truth Teller, January 1927, “This has been admitted by English medical officers of health, and the Ministry of Health has twice stated in answer to questions in Parliament that vaccination is one factor in the diagnosis of these cases”.

George Bernard Shaw, the illustrious poet and also an ardent campaigner on public health issues, once stated:

“During the last considerable epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the re-vaccinated cases (of smallpox) as postular eczema, varioloid or what not –except smallpox”.

Explaining the practice of ‘re-diagnosis’ and the reasons behind it, Leon Chaitow says “… faced with a patient who has all the signs and symptoms of a particular disease, from which they have been ‘protected’ by immunization, it is obviously difficult to make the diagnosis they would have made if faced by such a case in an unvaccinated person. By calling the disease something else they are protecting their belief system, and the integrity of the theories around which they have built their actions, such as vaccination …. All this is done to protect a system, and to help to save the public from having doubt as to the efficacy of methods. Re-diagnosis is a real phenomenon, and happens all the time. In the case of diphtheria this was rampant, and it is interesting to note that it was only the vaccinated cases of diphtheria which were diagnosed as something else. In some epidemics the figure of re-diagnosis reached 60% of cases. It is hard to see what sense can be made of statistics when they are based on inaccuracies of this sort”.

Another method of creating misleading statistics is False Diagnosis’. This involves a doctor diagnosing a particular disease, say polio, when in fact the patient does not really have polio. From his book, Hygienic Care Of Children, Herbert Shelton comments on the polio epidemics: “Polio epidemics are very largely physician made. Great numbers of cases of illness diagnosed as polio are not”. Shelton goes on to say: “The apparent disappearance of polio as a result of vaccination was brought about by a clever juggling stunt. Before the Salk vaccine was introduced, thousands of cases of polio were diagnosed each year in children who had no polio. After the introduction of the vaccine, these cases were no longer diagnosed as polio, this automatically appeared to reduce the case rate to the near vanishing point”.

Dr Bernard Greenberg, head of the Department of Biostatistics of the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, USA, has stated that prior to the Salk vaccine, large numbers of Cocksackie virus and asceptic meningitis cases were mislabeled as paralytic polio. Following the start of polio vaccinations, no such mislabeling occurred. Following the commencement of the Salk vaccine, many polio cases were reclassified under a different name, this again, leading to statistics indicating a reduction in polio incidence. Walene James, in her book, Immunization, Reality Behind the Myth, provides figures from the Los Angeles County Health Index Morbidity and Mortality, Reportable Diseases which reveals this fact.


Viral or Asceptic Meningitis


July 1955 50 273
July 1961 161 65
July 1963 151 31
Sept 1966 256 5

As confirmed in this same publication “Most cases reported prior to July 1, 1958, as non-paralytic poliomyelitis are now reported as viral or asceptic meningitis”.Further evidence comes from the Organic Consumer Report, March 1975 which states: “In a California Report of Communicable Diseases, polio showed a ‘nil’ count, while an accompanying asterisk explained ‘All such cases now reported as Meningitis'”.

Another technique for reducing statistics involves ‘redefinition of the disease’. In the USA, prior to the Salk polio vaccine, a case of paralytic poliomyelitis was diagnosed if the patient exhibited paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours. Yet after the start of the Salk vaccine, a case of paralytic poliomyelitis would only be diagnosed if the patient exhibited paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days! Commenting on the effect of this upon statistics, Dr T C Fry (Australian Wellbeing No.34 1989 p101) stated: “In conjunction with the introduction of the Salk vaccine, new guidelines were established by the Centre for Disease Control for the diagnosis of polio. Not only was paralysis necessary before the polio diagnosis could be made but it had to persist for more than 60 days. This cut the polio cases down to 10 to 15 per year automatically, for that was the extent of the number of cases even before the Salk vaccine. Yet from the publicity you’d think we had 55,000 cases of infantile paralysis a year instead of a few cases with most of the polio symptoms being ‘not life threatening and seldom lasting more than two weeks”.

The Medical Journal of Australia, November 4th 1967, contains figures on polio cases from 1950 onwards. These figures are accompanied by the comments, “Before July 1956, the numbers given are poliomyelitis notifications” and “After July 1956, they are cases accepted by the Poliomyelitis Surveillance Committee”.No doubt this Committee played the same game of ‘redefinition’ as did their counterparts in the USA.

Those who support the polio vaccine have claimed that polio epidemics declined following mass vaccination campaigns. What few people realise is that prior to the start of polio vaccination, the number of polio cases required in order to refer to polio as an epidemic was in the vicinity of 20 per 100,000. Following the introduction of Salk’s polio vaccine, the number of cases required was increased to 35 per 100,000. This would result in a decline of reported epidemics.

Fortunately, the whistle was blown on all this statistical juggling when Dr Bernard Greenberg, North Carolina School of Public Health, testified (May 1962 in the US Congressional Hearings on HR10541) that polio cases increased substantially following mass immunization campaigns. There was a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958 and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959. Dr Greenberg pointed to manipulation of statistics and false statements by the Public Health Service which gave the impression that vaccination was responsible for the reported polio decline.

Such statistical manipulation does not just occur with polio. Let us turn our attention to whooping cough.

In England DTP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whooping Cough) immunization rates decreased from 79% in 1973 to 31% in 1978. Between 1977-1980, there were 102,000 cases of whooping cough in which 28 died. Health authorities blamed this outbreak on low vaccination levels, citing as evidence the decrease in vaccination rates over the preceding years. On the surface this would seem a likely explanation, but if we delve more deeply, a different story emerges. There are several facts to consider.

Whooping cough, like measles, is cyclic in nature, which means that outbreaks tend to occur every 3-4 years regardless of vaccination rates. The British Medical Journal (25/9/1975) referring to whooping cough says: “Periodic increases in incidence occurred in 1960, 1963, 1967 and 1970. The most recent increase began at the end of 1973 and reached a peak at the end of 1974.” This would mean that the next outbreak was due around 1978 and this is exactly what happened. (The next major outbreak in England occurred in 1982 in which 50% of the cases were in fully vaccinated children!).

When there is a decline in vaccination rates for whooping cough, physicians have a tendency to diagnose whooping cough in children who do not have it. As Dr Mendelsohn points out, when vaccination rates decline, physicians tend to diagnose whooping cough “every time a baby clears his throat!. From their book, DPT: A Shot In The Dark, Doctors Coulter and Fisher point out:

“There is a natural tendency to under-report whooping cough when it occurs in a vaccinated population, and to over-report ‘it when it appears to be occurring in an un-vaccinated population”.

In the USA, 1982, the states of Maryland and Wisconsin reported whooping cough epidemics. Health officials blamed these outbreaks on un-vaccinated children. Yet, Dr Anthony Morris, an expert of bacterial and viral diseases, found laboratory confirmation to verify whooping cough diagnosis in only 21 out of 84 cases. Further to this, 82 of those 84 cases were in vaccinated children.

Notification of whooping cough is based upon clinical diagnoses. It is important to realise that a similar clinical picture can also be produced by adenoviruses and other viruses which effect the respiratory tract. As Professor Stewart points out (Here’s Health, March 1980):

“There was evidence also that there was, during this period a considerable increase in other respiratory and croup disease of children, so the possibility of errors in diagnosis and notification–in either direction–could not be excluded”.

What this means is that many respiratory infections can be incorrectly diagnosed as whooping cough, thus inflating the real figures.

It is well known that the incidence of whooping cough is more related to poor living conditions rather than vaccination levels. Professor Gordon Stewart states (British Medical Journal 31/1/1976):

“Whooping cough is much lower in incidence, hospital admissions are less frequent, and immunization schedules are often better maintained in districts where socioeconomic conditions are favourable. The reported association between protection and immunization could be an expression of better social conditions and child care as much as of biological protection by pertussis vaccine”.

In one study on the efficacy of whooping cough vaccine (The Lancet 29/1/1977 p235), Professor Stewart noted: “Of the unvaccinated, a significantly higher proportion of children and cases come from overcrowded homes in social classes IV & V.” Professor Stewart states that of 203 infants admitted to hospital with whooping cough, “93% were from social class III, IV and V, among whom vaccination rates were lower than among classes I and II”.

Many cases of whooping cough which occur in vaccinated children would be subject to the phenomenon of ‘re-diagnosis’ as explained previously. This has been confirmed by Dr Norman Noah (BMJ 17/1/1976) who states, “Family doctors might tend to diagnose and notify whooping cough less often in immunized children than in un-immunized ones” and also by Professor Gordon Stewart (The Lancet 29/1/1977) who says “General Practitioners are much less likely to notify whooping cough in vaccinated children where the symptoms are typical. The figures may therefore underrate the incidence in vaccinated children”.

In 1978, of the 67,008 cases notified no less than 31% (say 20,000) occurred in fully vaccinated children. In fact throughout the 1970s, 30-50% of whooping cough cases occurred in vaccinated children. In an epidemic in Malmo Sweden, 78% of cases had been fully vaccinated (Infectious Diseases In Europe, WHO).
How can ‘low’ vaccination levels be responsible for whooping cough outbreaks when it is clear that the vaccines do not work anyway!


Medical Lies!

Medical propaganda does not just involve misleading or inaccurate statistics, but in many cases, downright lies! And the biggest lies often come from our own Health Authorities.

A leaflet put out by the NT Department of Health and Community Services on Tuberculosis provides a good example. This leaflet states: “Up until the 1950s TB was a common cause of serious disease and death in Australia. Due to an aggressive campaign over the past 30 years and the discovery of effective new drugs, TB is now much less common ….” According to the Commonwealth Year Book No.40, the official figures on TB deaths are: 1921 – 3,687; 1931 – 3,167; 1941 – 2,734; 1951 – 1,538; 1961 – 447. In terms of population count, the TB death rate in Australia fell from 68 per 100,000 in 1921 to 49 per 100,000 in 1931 to 18 per 100,000 in 1951 and to 4 per 100,000 in 1961. These figures clearly indicate that the decline in TB death rate started well before any medical intervention, and that the rate of decline did not change with the introduction of drug therapy. This is the same scenario as with all other infectious diseases as shown in Chapter 1. Medical authorities try and take the credit for the lowered death rate, when in truth all credit should go to those responsible for improving our living and social conditions, for these are the real reasons for the decline in death rates.

In March 1991, a small measles outbreak amongst high school students in Darwin NT prompted Public Health officials to recommend that all students be immediately vaccinated. In fact the Communicable Diseases Director of Darwin Hospital, Dr Mohammed Patel recommended that students receive a ‘second’ measles shot just to be certain of adequate protection. This was in spite of US studies which showed that measles re-vaccination was ineffective. I forwarded a letter to the local media pointing this out and in response, Professor John Matthews, Director of the Darwin Menzies Health Research School forwarded a letter, and published in the Northern Territory News, which stated: “The present measles epidemic would not have been able to happen if all children had been immunized”. Yet only four months earlier an article on measles in the Journal of the American Medical Association, November 21st 1990, stated: “Although more than 95% of school-aged children in the United States are vaccinated against measles, large measles outbreaks continue to occur in schools, and most cases in this setting occur among previously vaccinated children”.

A booklet published by Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, a major Australian vaccine manufacturer, states: “Perhaps the greatest success story of immunization in Australia was the eradication of poliomyelitis in the 1950s through the use of the Salk and Sabin vaccines”. A quick glance at the real figures (see Chapter 1) reveals that vaccines had nothing to do with this decline. Referring to whooping cough, this booklet says: “Antibiotics cut the death rate tenfold in the late 1940s”.This claim is nothing less than outrageous, for firstly, the death rate for whooping cough went from 84 in 1945 to 34 in 1950, and secondly, it is a medical fact that antibiotics are useless against this illness. Writing in the British Medical Journal (29/11/1975) Dr N Grist says: “I regard whooping cough as a serious infectious disease against which our current ‘magic bullets’ are woefully ineffective”.

The presentation of distorted and misleading information on vaccinations and the general tendency of the public to accept this information without question was the subject of Clinton Miller’s testimony before the US House of Representatives on May 17th 1962. Clinton Miller stated:

“In mass vaccination programs, it is common practice to omit or ignore such information in presenting the case for vaccination to the public. There is a tendency to let the ‘experts’ make the decisions, after which they summarize the evidence with such press release statements as ‘absolutely safe’, and other statements designed not to educate, but to inspire absolute confidence.

“We point out that the tendency of a mass vaccination program is to ‘herd’ people. People are not cattle or sheep. They should not be herded. A mass vaccination program carries a built-in temptation to oversimplify the problem, to exaggerate the benefits, to minimize or completely ignore the hazards, to discourage or silence scholarly, thoughtful and cautious opposition, to create an urgency where none exists, to whip up an enthusiasm among citizens that can carry with it the seeds of impatience, if not intolerance, to extend the concept of the police power of the state in quarantine far beyond its proper limitation, to assume simplicity when there is actually great complexity, to continue support of a vaccine long after it has been discredited, to make a choice between two or more equally good vaccines, and promote one at the expense of the other, and to ridicule honest and informed dissent”.

Public Scare Campaigns

Napoleon once said: “There are two ways of moving men–interest or fear”. Probably the most effective way of cajoling the public into submitting to vaccination is the employment of ‘scare tactics’. Commenting on the strategy of ‘fear’ to entice people into vaccination, Dr John Keller had this to say:

“Since people cannot be vaccinated against their will, the biggest job of a health department has always been and always will be to persuade the unprotected people to get vaccinated. This we attempted to do in three ways: first by education, second by fright; and third by pressure. We dislike very much to mention fright and pressure. Yet they accomplish more than education because they work faster than education, which is normally a slow process. During the months of March and April, we tried education and vaccinated only 62,000. During May we made use of fright and pressure and vaccinated 223,000 people”.

From the book, The Dangers Of Immunization, by the Humanitarian Society, Pennsylvania, it states:

“Without question, the polio and just recent ‘swine flu’ programs were based shamefully and unabashedly on FEAR, just as unscrupulous politicians have for years exploited this hidden, subconscious motivating factor within human nature.

“The continual propaganda exuded by accepted scientists and the ever growing enemies of mankind constitutes neither more nor less than an insidious type of ‘brain-washing’ which we as Americans have every right to feel belongs in some spy movie or intrigue of foreign espionage, but NOT here in America… which of course has proven to be an illusion.

“Therefore, most of America now stands in the backwash of a very subtle ‘Advertising’ which a few recognized immediately as pure old propaganda, a form of ‘brain-washing’, a technique which is based on repeated impressions made on the mind of a person, until accepted as “truth”.

When it comes to vaccination, the public are warned of severe epidemics, deaths and disabilities, killer diseases, maimed victims etc should stop vaccination be stopped. In one newspaper article, the heading was titled “Immunize or Die!–Doc Warns”. Is it any wonder that most people line up for their vaccinations? Obviously most people are not in a position to judge for themselves the validity of such claims and therefore are easily persuaded into accepting vaccinations, much to the delight of the vaccine industry. What the majority of the public do not realize, is that in most cases, if not all, such scare tactics are completely unfounded. For example, many doctors maintain that measles can result in encephalitics at the rate of 1 out of every 1,000 cases. Yet, as Dr Mendelsohn points out “After decades of experience with measles, I question this statistic and so do many other pediatricians. The incidence of 1/1,000 may be accurate for children who live in conditions of poverty and malnutrition, but in middle- and upper income brackets, the incidence of true encephalitics is probably more like 1/10,000 or 1/100,000”.

Discussing measles deaths, The Lancet (1/8/1981 p236) says: “In the UK about 1% of people with measles are admitted to hospital, and one in ten thousand may die … children who die from measles are typically those with malnutrition, or some other severe intercurrent condition, who would soon die from some other cause if not from measles …. Half of the 132 deaths attributed to measles in the first 6 months of 1961 were in children with serious chronic disease or disability”.

In an article ‘Vitamin A and Measles in Third World Children1 (BMJ 1/12/1990 p1230), it states: “The severity of measles seems to be related to nutritional state and intensity of exposure. Malnourished children have a higher mortality and more severe complications, as do those living in overcrowded conditions”.

From their book, Infectious Diseases, by Ramsay and Emond, it states:

“In affluent countries with high standards of nutrition, measles is a mild disease … but in poor countries the illness tends to be severe with a high mortality… this is closely related to the standard of nutrition”.

Referring to whooping cough deaths, Professor Dick states (British Medical Journal 18/10/1975): “Deaths from whooping cough occur mainly in babies in social class V, and in assessing risks one must look at specific epidemiological situations – for there are obviously groups at high and low risk to whooping cough as there are with many diseases”. Dr Kalokerinos believes that death from infectious disease is not simply the result of a virus or bacteria, but a as a result of a biological or chemical weakness caused through malnutrition, poverty etc.

We are continually reminded by medical authorities of the devastating polio epidemics of the 1930s and 1940s, yet in England, the Register General figures on polio show that during the years 1943 – 1953 the average annual number of polio cases notified in England and Wales was 3,328, giving a monthly total of only 227 in a population of 42,290,000 or 6 per million. In 1947, when the highest death rate was recorded, there were 33 deaths per million children under 15 compared with 69 for measles and 99 for whooping cough. In the USA, 1942 there were 42 polio cases per 100,000 and in 1952, 15 cases per 100,000, not only indicating that the numbers were small, but they were well in decline before vaccination commenced.

In Public Health magazine, March 1955, Dr Dennis Geffen, QBE, MD, DPH, is reported to have told the Metropolitan Branch, Society of Medical Officers of Health that, “We are apt to forget that poliomyelitis is the least serious of all infectious diseases with the exception of that one complication, or extension of the disease, which destroys motor cells in the brain and spinal cord and causes paralysis. Apart from this it appears to be a mild infection lasting a few days, the symptoms of which are probably less serious than a cold in the head, and from which recovery is complete and immunity lasting”.


Adolf Hitler once said, “When you tell a lie loud enough, often enough, and big enough, the people will eventually believe it”. It is just unfortunate that, when it comes to the public, the majority of people want to believe in vaccination and this is probably the third major reason why vaccination still continues to this day. Dr Kalokerinos mentions a seminar conducted by the Committee for World Health at which he was a guest speaker. At the seminar, a lively debate ensued upon the subject of vaccination in which, as Dr Kalokerinos points out, “The consensus of opinion was that there would be far less immunizing if the public did not insist upon it” (Toorak Times 15/9/1981).

From the dawn of time, it has been a trait of human nature to seek out magical cures or potions for both the cure and prevention of disease. Vaccination serves this need because is satisfies the ‘quick and easy’ mentality adopted by most people in regard to maintaining or protecting their health. As few people are prepared to think logically or even to think for themselves, it is understandable why the majority are so easily persuaded into accepting a procedure which promises them protection from disease, without the effort of having to maintain their own health. Far easier to be given a ‘quick jab’ than to accept the more difficult task of living wisely.

From his book, Mirage Of Health, Professor Rene Dubos explains such behavior:

“The faith in the magical power of drugs often blunts the critical senses, and comes close at times to a mass hysteria, involving scientists and laymen alike. Men want miracles as much today as in the past. If they do not join one of the newer cults, they satisfy this need by worshipping the altar of modern science. This faith in the magical power of drugs is not new. It helped to give the authority of a priesthood and to recreate the glamour of ancient mysteries”.

Perhaps Mark Twain was right when he said:

“There are two types of infinity: space and man’s stupidity”.

Show quoted text

Bibles Compared



The categories of tables were selected to represent the most significant areas of change in modern translations which affect fundamental Christian doctrine. This listing is only a portion of the overwhelming number of alterations to essential doctrines.


“Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men.” (Philippians 2:5-7)

Modifications to key verses such as this one and others containing titles of the Lord Jesus Christ denigrate the doctrine of His deity.







I Timothy 3:16 God He (margin note – God) He He God
Daniel 3:25 the Son of God son of the gods a son of the gods a son of the gods the Son of God
Acts 3:13, 26 his Son Jesus His Servant Jesus His Servant Jesus his servant Jesus his servant Jesus
Philippians 2:6 thought it not robbery to be equal with God counted it not a prize to be on an equality with God did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped did not consider equality with God something to be grasped did not consider it robbery to be equal to God*
Acts 8:37 that Jesus Christ is the Son of God omitted(marginal note) omitted(marginal note) omitted(footnote) that Jesus Christ is the Son of God
John 6:69 thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God Thou art the Holy One of God You are the Holy One of God you are the Holy One of God you are the Christ, the Son of the living God
John 9:35 Son of God Son of God Son of Man Son of Man Son of God
Matthew 20:20 worshipping him worshipping him bowing down kneeling down kneeling down
John 4:42 this is indeed the Christ, the Savior of the world this is indeed the Savior of the world this One indeed is the Savior of the world this man really is the savior of the world this is indeed the Christ, the Savior of the world
Acts 15:11; 16:31 Lord Jesus Christ Lord Jesus Lord Jesus Lord Jesus Lord Jesus Christ*
Romans 1:3 Jesus Christ our Lord omitted omitted omitted Jesus Christ our Lord

I Corinthians 5:4

our Lord Jesus Christ our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus Christ
Ephesians 3:14 of our Lord Jesus Christ omitted omitted omitted our Lord Jesus Christ
I Thess. 2:19 our Lord Jesus Christ our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus Christ
I Thess. 3:11 our Lord Jesus Christ our Lord Jesus Jesus our Lord our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus Christ
II Thess. 1:8 our Lord Jesus Christ our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus our Lord Jesus Christ
John 14:28 my Father the Father the Father the Father My Father
Philippians 4:13 through Christ in him through Him through him through Christ
Acts 7:59 calling upon God calling upon the Lord called upon the Lord omitted calling on God

*NU – The most prominent modern critical text of the Greek New Testament, published in the 26th edition of the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament and in the 3rd edition of the United Bible Societies Greek New Testament. (New King James Version, Preface, “The New Testament Text”).


“And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.” (I Timothy 3:16)

New versions change “God” to “He” in this verse and omit other references to Jesus Christ coming in the flesh.







John 4:3 that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh Omitted omitted omitted that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh
Acts 2:30 according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ omitted omitted omitted according to the flesh He would raise up the Christ
Ephesians 5:30 of his flesh and of his bones omitted omitted omitted of His flesh and of His bones


“BEHOLD, A VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD, AND SHALL BRING FORTH A SON, AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME EMMANUEL, which being interpreted is, God with us. Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: and knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son; and he called his name JESUS.” (Matthew 1:23-25)

In the prophecy as it was originally given in Isaiah 7:14, the Revised Standard Version changes “virgin” to “young woman” and the NASB has “maiden” in a footnote. In Matthew 1:25, new versions change “her firstborn son” to “birth to a son”, casting doubt upon the virginity of Mary at Jesus’ birth.

Other verses are changed to indicate that Jesus was born of an earthly father. These alterations deny the role of the Holy Spirit in the conception of Jesus Christ and, therefore, His divine nature.







Matthew 1:25 her firstborn son brought forth a son birth to a Son birth to a son her firstborn Son
Luke 2:33 Joseph and his mother his father and his mother His father and mother The child’s father and mother Joseph and His mother
Luke 2:43 Joseph and his mother his parents His parents his parents Joseph and His mother


“Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: In whom we have redemption through his blood, eventhe forgiveness of sins.” (Colossians 1:13,14)

New versions remove reference to the blood atonement in this and other verses. Words are also omitted or changed which show that the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ is the full atonement for our sins.







Colossians 1:14 through his blood omitted omitted omitted through His blood
Colossians 1:24 that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ that which is lacking of the afflictions of Christ that which is lacking in Christ’s afflictions what is still lacking in regard to Christ’s afflictions what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ
I Corinthians 11:24 broken for you is for you (margin note) for you (marginal note) for you broken for you
I Cor. 5:7; I Peter 4:1 for us omitted omitted omitted for us
Ephesians 1:14 purchased possession God’s own possession God’s own possession God’s possession purchased possession
Hebrews 1:3 by himself omitted omitted omitted by Himself


“Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene…After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country . . .Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.” (Mark 16:9,12,14)

New versions isolate Mark 16:9-20 with the misleading disclaimer that it is not contained in the earliest manuscripts. They also question almost every appearance of Jesus after his resurrection, causing doubts concerning His bodily resurrection and deity.







Mark 16:9-20 Appearances of Jesus after His resurrection marginal disclaimer marginal disclaimer –verses replaced with: “And they promptly reported all these instructions to Peter and his companions. And after that, Jesus Himself sent out through them from east to west the sacred and imperishable proclamation of eternal salvation.” parenthetical disclaimer Appearances of Jesus after His resurrection
Luke 9:31 his decease his decease (margin) his departure his departure His decease
Acts 1:3 infallible proofs by many proofs convincing proofs convincing proofs infallible proofs
Ephesians 5:30 of his flesh and of his bones omitted omitted omitted of `His flesh and of His bones
Luke 13:32 the third dayI shall be perfected the third day I am perfected The third day I reach my goal the third day I will reach my goal the third day I shall be perfected
Luke 24:12 Peter at the empty tomb marginal disclaimer Parenthetical disclaimer Peter at the empty tomb Peter at the empty tomb
Luke 24:40 he showed them his hands and his feet he shewed them his hands and his feet omitted(marginal note) he showed them his hands and his feet He showed them His hands and His feet


“So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.” (Mark 16:11)

The ascension proves that Jesus Christ is now in heaven. Almost every mention of the ascension is omitted in some new versions.







John 16: 16 because I go to the Father omitted omitted omitted because I go to the Father
Luke 24:51 carried up into heaven carried up into heaven(marginal disclaimer) omitted(marginal note) taken up into heaven carried up into heaven
Mark 16:9-20(verse 19) received up into heaven marginal disclaimer parenthetical with marginal disclaimer parenthetical disclaimer received up into heaven
John 3:13 which is in heaven which is in heaven(marginal disclaimer) omitted(marginal note) omitted(footnote) who is in heaven


“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” (I John 5:7)

This is the famous Trinitarian proof text which F.J.A. Hort hoped to remove from the New Greek Text (see Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort).

It is missing from the New Greek New Testament Text, the English Revised Version and most modern translations.







I John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. omitted omitted(marginal disclaimer) omitted(footnote) for there are three who bear Witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit and these three are one.
Isaiah 48:16 the Lord God, and his Spirit, hath sent me. the Lord God hath sent Me, and His Spirit the Lord God has sent Me, and His Spirit the Sovereign Lord has sent me, with his Spirit. the Lord God and His Spirit have sent Me.
Romans 1:20 Godhead divinity divine nature divine nature Godhead
Acts 17:29 Godhead Godhead Divine Nature divine being Divine Nature
Colossians 2:9 Godhead Godhead Deity Deity Godhead


“And Philip said, ‘If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” (Acts 8:37)

New versions omit this verse and alter others to change justification by faith to salvation through works. Many versions delete “by himself” in Hebrews 1:3 to permit faith in another mediator, such as Mary. The omission of “on me” in John 6:47 allows any belief.







Acts 8:37 If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. omitted (marginal note) omitted (marginal note) omitted (footnote) “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”
Romans 11:6 but if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. omitted omitted omitted(footnote) but if it is of works, it is no longer grace: otherwise work is no longer work.
Romans 11:30-32 not believedunbelief DisobedientDisobedience disobedientdisobedience disobedientdisobedience disobedientdisobedience
Hebrews 3:18 believed not disobedient disobedient disobedient (footnote) did not obey
Galatians 5:22 faith faithfulness faithfulness faithfulness faithfulness
John 6:47 believeth on me that believeth believes believes believes in Me
Hebrews 1:3 by himself omitted omitted omitted by Himself
Mark 10:24 for them that trust in riches for them that trust in riches omitted omitted for those who trust in riches
Matthew 6:22 thine eye be single thine eye be single your eye is clear your eyes are good your eye is good


“The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” (Psalm 12:6,7)

In this important verse, new versions change “them” referring to the Scriptures to “us” referring to people. Other alterations and omissions diminish the authority of Scripture and discourage confidence in its divine inspiration and preservation.







Luke 4:4 but by every word of God omitted omitted omitted but by every word of God*
Psalm 12:6, 7 The words of the LORD are pure words…Thou shalt keep them,O LORD. Thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. the words of the Lord are pure words…Thou shalt keep them O Lord, Thou shalt preserve them from this generation forever. The words of the Lord are pure words…Thou, O Lord, wilt keep them; Thou wilt preserve him from this generation forever. And the words of the Lord are flawless…O Lord you will keep us safe and protect us from such people forever. The words of the Lord are pure words…You shall keep them, O Lord, you shall preserve them from this generation forever.
II John 9 doctrine of Christ teaching of Christ teaching of Christ teaching of Christ doctrine of Christ
II Corinthians 2:17 corrupt the word of God corrupting the word of God (marginal note) peddling the word of God peddle the word of God for profit peddling the word of God


“He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me. And he that seeth me seeth him that sent me. (John 12:44,45)

New versions frequently change masculine words referring to God to the neuter “One”. False religions of this world often identify their god as “the One”. The new “Politically Correct” bible calls God, “Father-Mother”, and Christ, “the human one.” (41)







John 7:18 his glory the glory of him the glory of the one the honor of the one the glory of the One
Colossians 3:10 the image of him the image of him to the image of the One the image of its Creator the image of Him
John 6:69 Christ, the Son the Holy One the Holy One the Holy One Christ, the Son
Revelation 1:18 he that liveth the Living one the living One the Living One He who lives
John 12:45, 15:21 him that sent me him that sent me the One who sent Me the One who sent me Him who sent Me
Matthew 13:37 He that soweth he that soweth the one who sows The one who sowed He who sows


“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning, how thou art cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations.” (Isaiah 14:12)

“I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.” (Revelation 22:16)

In the only passage of Scripture which describes Lucifer’s iniquity and fall into hell, most new versions omit the name Lucifer and confuse his identity with Jesus Christ.







Isaiah 14:12 O Lucifer, son of the morning Daystar, son of the morning O star of the morning

O morning star

O Lucifer, son of the morning
Luke 4:8 Get thee behind me, Satan omitted Omitted omitted Get behind me, Satan*

12. MAN

“What is man, that thou art mindful of him? And the son of man, that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. (Psalm 8:4,5)

New versions exalt man to being “a little lower than God” and omit many references to his fallen spiritual condition. Cults, the New Age and false religions also raise mankind to the level of being divine or in the process of evolving into gods. (42)







Psalm 8:5 the angels God(marginal note – angels) God the heavenly beings(footnote — than God) the angels
Matthew 18:11 that which was lost that which was lost Parenthetical omitted that which was lost
Colossians 3:6 children of disobedience sons of disobedience omitted omitted sons of disobedience
Mark 15:28 transgressors (in margin) omitted (marginal note) omitted transgressors


“That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.” (II Timothy 3:17)

New versions frequently delete words such as “righteousness”, “holy”, “perfect” and other requirements of the sanctified life. As a result, the gospel is brought into reproach by worldliness and corruption in the church.







I Thess. 5:27 holy brethren brethren (footnote — holy) brethren brothers holy brethren
II Peter 1:21 holy men men men men holy men
I Peter 1:22 pure heart heart heart (marginal note) heart (footnote) pure heart
I Corinthians 2:6 perfect Perfect(footnote – full grown) mature mature mature
II Timothy 3:17 perfect complete adequate thoroughly equipped complete
Proverbs 21:21 Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness prosperity Righteousness
I Peter 2:12 honest seemly excellent good conduct honorable
Titus 1:8 sober soberminded sensible self-controlled sober-minded
Jude 1:1 sanctified called called called sanctified
Mark 10:21 take up the cross omitted omitted omitted Take up the cross
Matthew 20:16 for many be called, but few chosen omitted omitted omitted for many are called, but few chosen
Romans 8:1 who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit. omitted omitted omitted(footnote) who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Matthew 5:44 bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you omitted omitted omitted(footnote) bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you
II Timothy 2:15 study give diligence be diligent do your best be diligent
I Timothy 4:15 meditate be diligent take pains be diligent meditate
Revelation 22:14 do his commandments wash their robes wash their robes wash their robes do His commandments


“After this manner therefore pray ye…” (Matthew 6:9)

New versions remove 21 words from The Lord’s Prayer in Luke 11 and words of instruction on prayer in other passages.







Luke 11:2 Our Father which art in heaven,Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth.. Father,Hallowed be thy name, Thy kingdom come Father,hallowed be Thy name.

Thy kingdom come.

Father,hallowed be your name,

your kingdom come.

Our Father in heaven,hallowed be Your name. Your kingdom come. Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
Luke 11:3 Give us day by day our daily bread Give us day by day our daily bread Give us each day our daily bread. Give us each day our daily bread. Give us day by day our daily bread.
Luke 11:4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us.And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. And forgive us our sins; for we ourselves also forgive every one that is indebted to us.And bring us not into temptation.

(marginal note)

And forgive us our sins,For we also forgive everyone who is indebted to us.

And lead us not into temptation.

Forgive us our sins, for we also forgive everyone who sins against us.And lead us not into temptation. And forgive us our sins, for we also forgive everyone who is indebted to us. And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one.
Matthew 6:13b For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen.. omitted parenthetical with disclaimer omitted(footnote) For yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.
Mark 13:33 watch and pray watch and pray (margin) keep on the alert be on guard, be alert watch and pray
Luke 21:36 pray always at every season, making supplication praying pray pray always
Acts 1:14 prayer and supplication omitted prayer prayer prayer and supplication
James 5:16 effectual fervent prayer supplication effective prayer prayer effective fervent prayer
Mark 9:29 prayer and fasting prayer (marginal note) prayer prayer prayer and fasting


“This same Jesus which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.” (Acts 1:11)

Important references to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to establish His reign upon earth are often omitted in the new versions. The New Age Movement, cults and apostate religions believe that “the Christ” is already on the earth and will soon be revealed. (43)







Matthew 6:13 for thine is the kingdom omitted (marginal note) Parenthetical omitted (footnote) for Yours is the kingdom
Matthew 25:13 the Son of man cometh omitted omitted omitted Son of Man is coming
Revelation 11:17 and art to come omitted omitted omitted and who is to come
Revelation 11:15 kingdoms of our Lord kingdom of our Lord kingdom of our Lord kingdom of our Lord kingdoms of our Lord
Titus 2:13 glorious appearing appearing of the glory appearing of the glory glorious appearing glorious appearing
John 18:36 now now as it is now now

16. SIN

“Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put him to grief; when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand.” (Isaiah 53:10)

New versions change “sin” to “guilt” in this important verse, thus relieving man of his accountability and placing the blame on God.

Rewording of I John 5:19 blames the devil for sin, as did Eve. Modern psychology in the church reflects this propensity to transfer responsibility for sin rather than to repent. New versions alter many verses pertaining to sin in order to present it in less relevant, personal and severe terms.







Luke 7:30 rejected the counsel of God against themselves rejected for themselves the counsel of God rejected God’s purpose for themselves rejected God’s purpose for themselves rejected the counsel of God for themselves
I Corinthians 5:1-6:13 fornication fornication immorality sexual immorality sexual immorality
Ephesians 5:5 Whoremonger fornicator immoral person immoral person fornicator
Galatians 5:19 adultery omitted immorality sexual immorality adultery
Deuteronomy 23:17 sodomite sodomite cult prostitute temple prostitute perverted (footnote)
I Timothy 1:10 them that defile themselves with mankind abusers of themselves with men homosexuals perverts sodomites
Galatians 5:21 murders omitted omitted omitted murders
Romans 13:9 Thou shalt not bear false witness omitted omitted omitted You shall not bear false witness
I Thess. 2:3 deceit, nor of uncleanness error, nor uncleanness error or impurity error or impure motives deceit or uncleanness
Mark 10:24 them that trust in riches them that trust in riches omitted omitted those who trust in riches
I Timothy 6:10 root of all evil root of all kinds of evil root of all sorts of evil root of all kinds of evil root of all kinds of evil
Mark 11:26 But if ye do not forgive, neither will your father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses. omitted(marginal note) omitted(marginal note) omitted(footnote) but if you do not forgive, neither will your Father in heaven forgive your trespasses.
Matthew 5:22 angry with his brother without a cause angry with his brother(marginal note) angry with his brother (marginal note) angry with his brother (footnote) angry with his brother without a cause
John 7:53-8:11 Passage included Passage omitted Marginal disclaimer parenthetical disclaimer Passage included
Isaiah 53:10 an offering for sin   a guilt offering a guilt offering an offering for sin
I John 5:19 wickedness the evil one Power of the evil one control of the evil one sway of the wicked one
Revelation 2:15 which thing I hate omitted Omitted omitted which thing I hate
II Timothy 3:2 blasphemers railers Revilers abusive blasphemers
II Timothy 3:3 trucebreakers false accusers… despisers of those who are good Implacable slanderers no lovers of good IrreconcilableMalicious gossips haters of good unforgiving slanderous not lovers of the good unforgiving slanderers despisers of good
Titus 2:5 blasphemed blasphemed dishonored malign blasphemed
Revelation 22:11 unjust unrighteous does wrong does wrong unjust
II Corinthians 4:2 dishonesty things of shame shame shameful ways shame
Matthew 23:14 ye devour widows houses and for a pretense make long prayers omitted(marginal note) Parenthetical with disclaimer Omitted(footnote) you devour widows houses and for a pretense make long prayers


“And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust from under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, it shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the Day of Judgment, than for that city.” (Mark 6:11)

References to a final Day of Judgment are often missing in new versions. New Age prophets teach that, since God is love, He does not judge anyone. Belief in a literal hell and fear of God’s judgment are both foolishness and an offense to modern man.







Daniel 7:10 judgment judgment court court court
Matthew 5:21 in danger of the judgment judgment liable to the court subject to judgment in danger of the judgment
Mark 6:11 the day of judgment omitted omitted omitted the day of judgment
Luke 17:36 Two shall be in the field, the one shall be taken and the other left. omitted(marginal note) omitted(marginal note) omitted(footnote) Two men will be in the field, the one will be taken and the other left.
II Corinthians 5:11 the terror of the Lord the fear of the Lord the fear of the Lord to fear the Lord the terror of the Lord
Revelation 6:17 day of his wrath day of their wrath day of their wrath day of their wrath day of His wrath
Revelation 12:12 Woe to the inhabiters of the earth woe for the earth woe to the earth woe to the earth Woe to the inhabitants of the earth
Revelation 15:3 King of saints King of the ages King of the nations King of the ages king of the saints
Revelation 15:4 thy judgments are made manifest thy righteous acts have been made manifest thy righteous acts have been revealed your righteous acts have been revealed your judgments have been manifested
Revelation 21:24 the nations of them which are saved the nations the nations the nations the nations of those who are saved
Revelation 22:19 God shall take away his part out of the book of life. God shall take away his part from the tree of life. God shall take away his part from the tree of life. God will take away from him his share in the tree of life. God shall take away his part from the Book of Life.

18. HELL

“The wicked shall be turned into hell, andall the nations that forget God.” (Psalm 9:17)

New versions change “shall be turned into hell” to “return to the grave” or “Sheol”. In similar verses, “the depths” or “the realm of death” is substituted. Descriptions of the everlasting torment of souls in hell are eliminated or softened.







Psalm 9:17 The wicked shall be turned into hell The wicked shall return to Sheol the wicked will return to Sheol the wicked return to the grave the wicked shall be turned into hell
Deuteronomy 32:22 lowest hell lowest pit lowest part of Sheol realm of death lowest hell
Job 26:6 hell Sheol (margin – grave) Sheol death sheol
Isaiah 57:9 hell hell Sheol grave sheol
Matt. 11:23; Luke 10:15 brought down to hell go down unto hades descend to Hades go down to the depths brought down to hades
Mark 9:44, 46 Where their worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched. omitted(marginal disclaimer) omitted omitted(footnote) Where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.


“I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: which is not another; But there be some that trouble you and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:6-8)







Romans 1:16 I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ I am not ashamed of the gospel I am not ashamed of the gospel I am not ashamed of the gospel I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ
Matthew 19:17 There is none good but one, that is God one there is who is good There is only One who is good. There is only One who is good. No one is good but One, that is God.
Luke 2:14 good will toward men men in whom he is well pleased men with whom he is pleased men in whom his favor rests good will toward men
Matthew 18:11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. For the Son of man came to save that which was lost. Parenthetical with disclaimer omitted(footnote) For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost.
Mark 15:28 And he was numbered with the transgressors omitted(marginal note) omitted(marginal note) omitted(footnote) And he was numbered with the transgressors
Colossians 1:14 through his blood omitted omitted omitted (footnote) through His blood
Hebrews 1:3 purged our sins made purification of sins made purification of sins purification for sins purged our sins
I John 5:19 wickedness the evil one power of the evil one control of the evil one sway of the wicked one
Luke 7:30 rejected the counsel of God against themselves rejected for themselves the counsel of God rejected God’s purpose for themselves rejected God’s purpose for themselves rejected the counsel of God for themselves
John 9:35 Dost thou believe on the Son of God? Dost thou believe on the Son of God? (marginal note – Son of man) Do you believe in the Son of Man? Do you believe in the Son of Man? Do you believe in the Son of God?
Acts 3:13, 26 his Son Jesus his Servant Jesus His Servant Jesus his servant Jesus his Servant Jesus
I John 5:13 that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God omitted omitted omitted that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God.
II Corinthians 2:15 are saved are being saved are being saved are being saved are being saved
Mark 10:21 take up the cross omitted omitted omitted take up the cross
Jude 1:1 sanctified called called called sanctified
I Thess. 5:27 holy brethren brethren (footnote – holy) brethren brothers holy brethren
Romans 8:1 who walk not after the flesh, but after the spirit omitted omitted omitted(footnote) who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Ephesians 4:6 God…who isin you all God…who is…in all God…who is…in all God…who is…in all God…who is in you all
Acts 8:5 preached Christ Proclaimed…the Christ proclaiming Christ proclaimed the Christ preached Christ
I Corinthians 1:21 foolishness of preaching Foolishness of the preaching (marginal note – of the thing preached) foolishness of the message preached foolishness of what was preached foolishness of the message preached
Acts 4:4 the word The word the message the message the word


Who will soon come to establish His Millennial Kingdom?

The NASB and NIV remove references to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Matthew 24:24 says:

“There shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if itwere possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”

Many shall come in Jesus’ name, claiming that they will establish the kingdom of God preceding or in the place of Jesus Christ.






Matthew 6:13 for thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory, forever. Amen Parentheticalmarginal disclaimer Footnote for Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.
Matthew 25:13 the Son of man cometh Omitted Omitted Son of man is coming
Revelation 11:17 and art to come Omitted Omitted and who is to come
Titus 2:13 glorious appearing appearing of the glory Glorious appearing glorious appearing
Mark 13:6 saying, “I am Christ saying, “I am he Claiming, “I am he saying, “I am he
Luke 11:2b Thy will be done as in heaven, so on earth Omitted omitted(footnote) Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

What will happen just prior to Jesus Christ’s return?

II Thessalonians 2:3-12 foretells that many will fall away from or deny the true faith, “the truth” (v. 10) that God became man in Jesus Christ. They will worship a counterfeit Christ who is Satan incarnate, while under a strong delusion that mankind is being transformed into gods. New version terms “rebellion,” “lawlessness” and “destruction” may be applied to those who oppose this antichrist system.






II Thessalonians 2:3

there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction the rebellionoccurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction unless the falling away comes first and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition.

How are we to prepare for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ?

Jesus gives his disciples instructions to “watch and pray,” as He did Peter, “that ye enter not into temptation.” Those who do not heed this warning will fall away and will be not counted worthy to escape the judgment that is coming upon all those who dwell on the earth.






Mark 13:33 watch and pray keep on the alert be on guard, be alert watch and pray
Luke 21:36 pray always, that ye may beaccounted worthyto escape all these things praying in order that you may havestrength to escape all these things pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to happen pray always that you may be counted worthy to escape all these things

How will the Antichrist be recognized?

The spirit of antichrist does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh, but believes that Christ comes as the “universal consciousness” of the divine spirit within each person. The Antichrist exalts himself above God and will exterminate many through an artifice of “peacemaking,” be a practitioner of witchcraft or “the Craft” (Freemasonry) and will worship “the force” of pagan religions.






I John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; and this is the spirit of antichrist but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the antichrist
Daniel 8:25 he shall cause craft to prosper…and by peace shall destroy many He will cause deceit to succeed by his influence . . . destroy many while they are at ease He will cause deceit to prosper… When they feel secure, he will destroy many he shall cause deceit to prosper…he shall destroy many in their prosperity
Daniel 11:38 shall he honour the God of forces he will honor a god of fortresses he will honor a god of fortresses he shall honor a god of fortresses

What is the mark, the name and the number of the Beast?

The NASB and NIV do not clearly differentiate between the mark, the name and the number of the Beast. Please refer to the Watch Unto Prayer report on The Mark of the Beast, which provides convincing evidence that the Beast is the Assyrian-Babylonian god, Saturn, whom the apostate Israelites worshipped as Remphan (Acts 7:37-43). The name of blasphemy is the Tetragrammaton (YHWH, aka Yeshua) and the mark is the Six-Pointed Star or the Star of David.






Revelation 13:17 the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name

Should people receive the name of the Beast?

God will seal His servants’ foreheads during the Tribulation. New versions add “his name and” to this prophecy, leading the unwary to take the name of the beast or antichrist before receiving the Lamb’s Father’s name. All who take “his name” are condemned. (14:9,10)






Revelation 14:1 His father’s name written intheir foreheads His name and his father’s name written on their foreheads His name and his father’s name written on their foreheads His father’s name writtenon their foreheads


Mystery Babylon is both a city and a religious system. New versions change the punctuation of Revelation 17:9,10 to confuse the identity of the “city of seven hills,” which is Rome. Revelation 14:8 and 17:18 are references to “that” great city mentioned in 17:9. In 17:5, the NASB transfers the key word “Mystery” from the literal name on her forehead to a descriptive phrase declaring the name “a mystery,” or knowledge not revealed to man. This changes the interpretation by removing its association with the mystery religion of ancient Babylon from which Freemasonry, which is based on The Kabbalah, ultimately derives. It is well-documented that Freemasonry has infiltrated and now controls the Vatican.






Revelation 17:9,10 The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. And there are seven kings. The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits, and they are seven kings The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits. They are also seven kings The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. There are also seven kings
Revelation 14:8 Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great Fallen, fallen is Babylon the Great Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city
Revelation 17:18 the woman which thou sawest is that great city the woman whom you saw is the great city The woman you saw is the great city the woman whom you saw is that great city

*A more thorough analysis of these and other Scripture changes in modern versions which affect the interpretation of Bible prophecy is presented in New Age Bible Versions, by Gail Riplinger. (A.V. Publications, Box 280, Ararat, VA, 1993, 1-800-435-4535)

**ENDNOTES: See Another Bible ~ Another Jesus

© Copyright 1997 by Robert Baker

This booklet may be reproduced in whole or part, provided that no part of it is modified.

Another Bible, Another Gospel is available in a 30-page bound booklet which is a helpful tool for comparing Scripture verses in the major versions. This booklet is available upon request from: Watch Unto Prayer, P.O. Box 2323, Wayne, NJ 07474-2323.

Has God preserved His Word? The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. (Psalm 12:6-7)

Is the King James Bible Inspired Or Preserved?

By David J. Stewart | March 2009 | Updated September 2016

“Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible,
by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.” 
—1st Peter 1:23

       Both! The precious King James Bible is BOTH inspired and preserved. There are some teachers today who say that the King James Bible is not preserved. There are others who say that the King James Bible is not inspired. And some teachers deny both preservation and inspiration. Without a doubt this is a delicate and sensitive issue in churches today, because the Bible is the greatest number one threat to Satan. Yet, if we’re wrong on the Bible as born-again Christians, then we’re wrong on everything else. There is a raging battle today over the King James Bible.

You don’t have to read very far in contemporary, fundamentalist, Baptist literature to come across scoffers who attack the King James only” position and degrade those of us who would dare call the King James Bible “inspired.” Well, bless God, it’s inspired Word for Word!

  • Dr. Jerry Falwell announced that he had hired Dr. Harold Rawlings to “refute the ‘King James Only’ cultic movement that is damaging so many good churches today.”
  • Dr. Robert Sumner warns about the “veritable fountain of misinformation and deceptive double talk on the subject of ‘King James Onlyism.’”
  • Dr. J. B. Williams refers to those who advocate the King James Only as “misinformers” and as “a cancerous sore.
  • Dr. Robert Joyner calls King James Bible loyalists, “heretics.”
  • Dr. James R. White warns about King James Bible proponents undercutting the very foundations of the faith itself.
  • And now in 2009 an influential pastor of one of America’s largest Independent Fundamental Baptist Churches is calling us “careless Bible students” and “ignorant” for saying that the King James Bible is inspired. How tragic!

I just don’t get it. Why would any Christian leader shake his congregation’s faith in the Word of God? If the Bible that we hold in our hands is not inspired, then let’s just throw it into the garbage and go buy the latest New York Times Bestseller to read instead. Thank God for Dr. Jack Hyles who upheld the King James Bible as inerrant and perfect…

“I must have every Word if I speak His message. If I didn’t think I had a perfect Bible I’d close this one, walk out that door, I’d never walk in the pulpit again.” Dr. Jack Hyles

The 54 King James Bible translators (47 did the actual work of translating) were a collection of some of the world’s best scholars. They approached this translation with the mindset that they were translating the very Words of God, not just some book. The King James Bible has been called “the monument of English prose” as well as “the only great work of art ever created by a committee.” Howbeit, the question is raised, is the King James Bible inspired? I say, yes, absolutely, and it is self evident.

We must begin with the Scriptures themselves, for Jesus commanded in John 5:39… SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES!

2nd Timothy 3:16 proclaims, “ALL SCRIPTURE is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.” Some teachers lift out the words “is given,” claiming that only the original autographs given by God were inspired. I have a serious problem with that, because God promised to PRESERVE His Word in Psalm 12:6,7, “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified SEVEN TIMES. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”

For someone to say that God preserves His Word without inspiration is akin to saying that God preserves our salvation without the Holy Spirit. It just doesn’t set right. The very notion that a translation does not contain the inspired Words of God is disturbing indeed. And if a translation DOES contain the inspired Words of God, then it is divinely inspired.

Here is an excellent quote from Dr. Shelton Smith of the Sword Of The Lord…

“God has preserved His inspired Word for us. It is preserved in the Hebrew Masoretic text and in the Greek Textus Receptus. It is also preserved for us in the English in the King James Bible. What He at first inspired, the Lord God has now preserved. Therefore, when I hold the King James Bible in my hand, I hold the inspired text. It was inspired and now that inspired Word has been protected, preserved and provided for us!”

SOURCE: What Is That Book You Hold In Your Hand?, by Dr. Shelton Smith, editor, Sword of the Lord.

Yes, I agree! How could God’s preserved Word not be inspired? If God has kept His promise to PRESERVE His Word (and He has!), then those Words must also maintain their inspiration. To say that onlythe originals (also know as the “autographs”) were inspired is to say that we do not have God’s inspired Word for today, which means that we cannot claim 2nd Timothy 3:16. If the man of God is to be “perfect,” then he absolutely MUST have the “inspired” Words of God to profit him.

It is expected for unsaved heathens to claim that mortal men authored the Bible. Yet, how sad it is when Gospel preachers agree with them by saying that flawed men wrote flawed translations which are flawed. How can any believer who loves the Lord feel confident if they are taught that the Bible they love, cherish and obey is imperfect? They cannot. It is a woeful injustice to rob a church congregation of their faith in God’s Word by diminishing the inerrancy and inspiration of the King James Bible. God has preserved His Word for the English-speaking people in the King James Bible, and it does not contain errors. Volumes of books have been written addressing alleged discrepancies and so-called mistranslations in the King James Bible. Ultimately, critics of the King James Bible find themselves barking up an empty tree.

Dr. Jack Hyles (1926-2001) believed that the King James Bible is inspired. The following quote is taken from his book, The Need for an Every-Word Bible, page 54…

“I’m tired of colleges and universities advertising that they use the King James Bible. Tell the whole story! Tell everyone that you do not believe that it is inspired word for word.” —Dr. Jack Hyles

A friend of mine who used to teach martial arts taught his students, “Practice does not make you perfect, perfect practice makes you perfect.” When he told me that I immediately thought about the King James Bible, because an imperfect Bible can only produce imperfect children. Corruption can only bring forth corruption. Jesus said an evil tree can only bring forth evil fruit. The reason why the King James Bible has been so successful over the centuries in getting people saved is because it is God’s inspired, infallible, inerrant and preserved Word.

King James Bible Inspiration
(a great MP3 defense of the Christian faith by Pastor David Baker)

The Words Of The King James Translators

The King James translators humbly stated that their work may contain “imperfections and blemishes.” Remember, this is THEIRopinion of THEIR best efforts to better the Word of God in English. We must not forget that GOD PROMISED TO PRESERVE HIS WORD and was overseeing the work . . .

“No cause therefore why the word translated should be denied to be the word, or forbidden to be current, notwithstanding that some imperfections and blemishes may be noted in the setting forth of it. For whatever was perfect under the Sun, where Apostles or Apostolic men, that is, men endued with an extraordinary measure of God’s spirit, and privileged with the privilege of infallibility, had not their hand?” [emphasis added]

In Exodus 4:10 we find Moses lacking confidence in his own communication skills, and yet God used Moses to author the first five books of the Old Testament, “And Moses said unto the LORD, O my Lord, I am not eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since thou hast spoken unto thy servant: but I am slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.” Clearly, Moses did not feel qualified to relay God’s Word to the people. The humility of the King James translators does not in any way mean that God wasn’t in complete control of the work they did. They prayerfully and diligently labored to give us the King James Bible.

Dr. Samuel Gipp states in favor of the King James Bible being inspired . . .

QUESTION: Did the translators of the Authorized Version claim to be inspired by God?

ANSWER: No. But Biblically that does not mean that they could not have been inspired. [emphasis added]

Does this mean that, because they did not claim God’s hand in translating the Scripture that He could not be or was not in control of their commission? For the answer we must look to the Bible, our final authority in all matters of faith and practice.

When John the Baptist was accosted by the Levites in John chapter one and asked if he was Elijah (John 1:21) he answered that he was 
not Elijah. Yet in Matthew chapters 11:7-14 and 17:10-13 Jesus Christ plainly stated that John was Elijah.

Did John the Baptist lie? No. Did Jesus Christ lie? Of course not. The answer is very simply that John wasElijah but he didn’t know it! Thus we see from our Bible example that a man can have God working through him and not know it. Likewise, God could easily have divinely directed the King James translators without their active knowledge.

SOURCE: THE ANSWER BOOK, chapter 14, by Dr. Samuel C. Gipp, Th.D.

I say, most definitely, yes, God was in control of the King James Bible committee and the Words of the King James Bible are inspired. This is not “double inspiration.” That is, God did not give His Words afresh to the King James translators. It simply means that God’s Words are inspired and always will be inspired, no matter what language they are translated into.

In 1st Corinthians 7:6 the Apostle Paul said, “But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.” Paul felt that he was merely giving his personal opinion in this portion of Scripture, rather than writing what God had commanded him to; yet we know from 2nd Timothy 3:16 that, “ALL SCRIPTURE is given by inspiration of God.” Paul’s writings in the Bible are all inspired by God, because Paul was only the pen which God used to give us His Words.

God is the Author of the entire Bible. God used imperfect men to write His perfect Word, by putting His Words into their mouth. God made unholy men holy for His purpose. So it matters not that Moses was not eloquent in speech, nor that Paul gave his personal opinion in 1st Corinthians chapter 7, nor that the King James translators acknowledged that they were only imperfect men—What’s important is that God’s Words will forever be incorruptible, settled in Heaven, preservedAND INSPIRED.

“One Book Stands Alone encourages believers to stand by the one and only inspired book of God, the King James Bible. Dr. Douglas Stauffer

Some scholars today claim that God has only preserved His Word in the original languages; but the Bible does not teach that. It is self-evident that God has chosen America as the citadel of Christianity over the past 100 years to the world, having sent out millions of foreign missionaries with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Heresy went East, but truth went West. I believe God has preserved His inspired Word in the English-speaking language in the King James Bible. I do not believe that the King James Bible is merely a superb translation or the best manuscript available in English.

I believe it is God’s inspired, inerrant, infallible, impeccable and preserved Word. 1st Peter 1:23 plainly states that sinners are “Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.” This means we need an incorrupt Bible! It is sad that preachers don’t start doubting the Word of God until they go to seminary. Maybe we should call them preacher cemeteries.

“The only inspired Words of God are in the King James Bible!”
—Dr. Jack Hyles (an awesome quote from the classic MP3 sermon titled, “THE REAL BATTLE!”)

The King James Bible was the finished product of SEVEN revisions. Interestingly, “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified SEVEN TIMES. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” Notice that God said His Word is “pure,” as pure as silver refined seven times. (the number seven in the Bible represents God’s perfection.) We have God’s perfect Word in the English language in the King James Bible. Amen! It is the manuscript God wanted us to have to fellowship with Him and do the work of soulwinning.

The King James translators said they weren’t trying to make a new translation of the Bible; but rather, a good one better…

“Truly (good Christian Reader) we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to make a new Translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one, (for then the imputation of Sixtus had been true in some sort, that our people had been fed with gall of Dragons instead of wine, with whey instead of milk:) but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principal good one, not justly to be excepted against; that hath been our endeavor, that our mark.”

If one truly believes that a sovereign God is able to work in the hearts of men to do His will, and if one believes that God has kept His promise to preserve His Word, and if one considers that the mightiest soul-winning men of God over the past four centuries have preached from the King James Bible, it is self-evident that God has given to us the King James Bible. Is God incapable of preserving His Word without mistakes? Of course! If, as some claim, the Bible is only preserved in the original languages today, then we do not have an English Bible in America? Which means we are hopelessly destitute.

If the King James Bible is less than perfect, then why even preach from it? Why preach from an imperfect Word? If the King James Bible is imperfect, then what are you doing using it? If the King James Bible is imperfect, then so is everything you teach from it. I mean, if the King James Bible has hundreds of problems with it as many preachers are claiming today, let’s throw our Bible into the garbage. A pastor who places a question mark on the King James Bible is no better than Satan who weakened Eve’s faith when he asked her, “Yea, hath God said?” (Genesis 3:1c).

Matthew 4:4, “But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” If we are to live by “every Word,” then we need an every Word Bible. I believe the King James Bible to be that every Word Bible, preserved and inspired by God.

Some preacher says that the Bible is only for the scholarly and studious. No, the Bible is for anyone who wants to pick it up and use it, read it and hear it.

“The King James Bible crowd is going to come out on top!”
—Dr. Jack Hyles (an awesome quote from the classic MP3 sermon titled, “THE BATTLE OF THE AGES!”)

In Preservation, We Have the Originals

The Bible doesn’t say that the man of God needs the “preserved” Words of God to profit him; but rather, the “Scripture given by inspiration of God.” People talk about the “originals,” but according to Psalm 12:6,7 we have the originals. Psalm 12:6,7, “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” God didn’t promise in Psalm 12:6,7 to renew or republish His Words. No, rather, God promised to PRESERVE His Words, “as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.”

What we hold in our hands today in the form of the King James Bible is the PRESERVED inspired originals, which means the King James Bible has to be inspired. God’s Word has been preserved. If the King James Bible is not inspired, then God did not preserve His Word, because His Word is inspired. Preservation MUST include inspiration if it is genuine preservation.

The word “preserve” in Psalm 12:7 means “to maintain.” Hence, God has maintained His inspired Word unto all generations, as He so promised, which means that those Words must remain inspired. 

Psalm 119:89 proclaims, “For ever, O LORD, Thy word is settled in heaven.” Notice that the originals are in Heaven. Before God ever spoke the universe into existence, the final Word of Revelation was already recorded in Heaven. Some Biblical scholars claim that the original manuscripts are only existent in the Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic languages; but it is not a language that God promised to inspire, it is HIS WORDS. It is the “Words” of the Lord that are pure. God Words are inspired, no matter what language they are translated into. The text of our beloved King James Bible are the inspired Words of God.

Please Don’t Drop My Food On the Floor

For any preacher to speak bad about the King James Bible, while simultaneously speaking about how wonderful it is, is akin to dropping someone’s food on the floor and then serving it to them on a plate. The same way most people would feel eating a steak that has just been dropped onto a dirty floor is the same way many church members feel when their pastor teaches them from a Bible which he claims is imperfect. Either we have God’s preserved, inspired, inerrant, infallible Word in the English-speaking language, or we do not. The Bible is our spiritual milk, bread and meat. I don’t know about you, but most people prefer not to have their food tampered with before they eat it. So keep your stinking feet out of my drinking water and my food.

No pastor should ever shake his congregation’s faith in the King James Bible, even in the slightest way. The average uneducated layman in the pew needs to hear his pastor uphold the King James Bible as God’s Word. To fail to do so is a grave injustice against the common man. The average believer will NEVER understand Greek or Hebrew and it is a woeful injustice to place that kind of a burden upon humble church people, i.e., telling them that they cannot understand the Bible without learning Greek and Hebrew. Childlike faith only requires a childlike understanding of the Bible.

Do not tell me that a child cannot understand the Bible to get saved. Do not tell me that those with learning disabilities must understand the Greek to be saved. Do not tell me that a humble sinner, who only has a third grade education, cannot receive and experience sweet fellowship with Jesus Christ without learning Hebrew. Bless God, if the King James Bible was good enough for mama, it’s good enough for us too! If the King James Bible was good enough for Dwight L. Moody and Billy Sunday, bless God, it’s good enough for us too!

“They’re taking the pure Word of God and changing it for a buck and changed it for a dollar. So-called Christian colleges, take your stinking feet out of the Word of God! Quit serving dirty water! So-called Christian seminaries with your intelligencia, which is nothing more than stupidity hiding behind the guise of scholarship, you keep your stinking feet out of my drinking water! Dr. Custer of Bob Jones University, who says that there is no perfect Bible in the English language, you keep you stinking feet out of my drinking water! Greek scholars, so-called, self-styled Greek scholars, who are only called ‘Greek scholars’ by other Greek scholars, you keep your stinking feet out of my drinking water! … I am so sick of these guys that go to an institution. I’ve got more respect for a State university professor who says there’s no Word of God, than I have for a man who’ll hide behind the sacred desk and change God’s blessed Book.”Dr. Jack Hyles

Dr. Lee Roberson (1909-2007) believed that the King James Bible is inspired. In his sermon, HAVE FAITH IN GOD, he made the following statement concerning his text verse, Mark 11:22, “And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God” Pastor Roberson referred to the King James Bible as “these inspired words.” Amen. There are some preachers today who deny the inspiration of our precious King James Bible. It is apostasy. Thank God for Dr. Roberson’s faith in the King James Bible as God’s inspired, inerrant, infallible, impeccable and preserved Words of God.

“Whether in sunshine or rain, it will help us to have these inspired words before us: HAVE FAITH IN GOD.”

In defense of the inspired and preserved King James Bible, the following quotes are taken from the excellent sermon by Pastor Jack Hyles, LOGIC MUST PROVE THE KING JAMES BIBLE

I have Mama’s Bible—the same one she read—in my office. I’ve had it there for years. I don’t know how old it is, but I suspect it is 55 or 60 years old. It is the same Bible she used to hold up. I was thumbing through it the other day. On the inside, it says on the title page, “King James Bible.” That’s what it says. You know it worked. It’s amazing how well Mama did before she found out that it wasn’t the Word of God.

It is amazing how well this nation did when we didn’t know how ignorant we were. (Are you listening?) This is my fifth pastorate. I’ve seen miracles in my pastorates. I’ve preached over 41,000 times, and I’ve never yet preached a sermon that wasn’t preached from the King James Bible.

It bothers me when people say, “We believe that the Bible, in the original manuscripts, is the Word of God.” If that’s true, we have no Bible. Did you hear what I said? We have no Bible.

We need a Bible that we can understand and a Bible that is God’s Word. It looks like anybody would agree that if God gives us the command to preach the Word, He would give us the Word to preach. That’s logical. If God wants to say to a nation, “You are the custodian of world evangelization for a generation or two or three or four,” it looks like God would give that nation the Word of God.

What is it? I would say it ought to be the one that has worked. Which one has worked? The one I hold in my hand right now. I has worked! It will work!

The following is sang to the tune of The Old-Time Religion:

It was good for our fathers;
It was good for our fathers;
It was good for our fathers;
And it’s good enough for me;

It was good for my mama;
It was good for my mama;
It was good for my mama;
And it’s good enough for me.

Did God Only Inspire the Original Autographs of the Bible?

THE BATTLE OF THE AGES (an awesome KJB defense by Dr. Jack Hyles)

Ye Must Be Born Again! | You Need HIS Righteousness!

Contemplative Spirituality Exposed

Contemplative Spirituality Exposed!

by T. A. McMahon | The Berean Call Newsletter, March 2000

Please Contemplate This…Suppose you were introduced to a promotion promising a direct line of communication with the Creator of the universe. 

Let’s say you’re initially skeptical, but you also find the idea appealing. After all, who wouldn’t want to be able to hear from and speak with God as though He were on one’s cell phone? As you listen to the deal being pitched and peruse some of the literature, you realize that the key to this is the use of a Ouija board. You push the literature aside and head for the exit. 

Virtually every evangelical Christian would quickly reject the proposalespecially if he were aware that a Ouija board is an instrument of divination, a device for contacting spirit entities, which the Bible explicitly condemns (Dt 18:10). The basic problem with divination is that, even though the diviner is sincerely attempting to contact God, the entities with which one ends up communicating are demons (posing as Jesus, God, angels, departed loved ones, aliens, gods, etc.). 

Discernment regarding the above example is for the most part, as my kids would say, “a no brainer!” However, that’s rarely the case in today’s spiritual marketplace. In particular, the “new and improved” or “revived” ways of communicating with God promoted among evangelicals are highly deceptive and very seductive. God has given His Word and His Holy Spirit to help us discern what is of Him and what is not. It’s particularly disturbing that a lethal portion of the “what is not” has entered the arena of our evangelical youth. Under the guise of “spiritual exercises that invite direct experiences with God,” and with the assurance that they are “classical forms of biblical meditation,” growing numbers of our “church” kids are being led unwittingly into the occult. 

As I researched what I consider to be an extremely dangerous “spiritual” trend in the body of Christ, my empathy and concern deepened for the young people and youth pastors involved. I have little doubt that the motivation common to most of them arises from a desire to know God more intimately. That is not only what every biblical believer wants but, more importantly, that’s what the Lord wants for us. Furthermore, no truly born-again Christian can deny the experiential aspect of his personal relationship with Jesus Christ. So what exactly is the problem? God’s way is being forsaken for man’s way—and worse. 

Programs and practices rife with occult methodologies and techniques have been in the works at churches and youth ministries around the country: Taizé, Lectio Divina, The Labyrinth (prayer walk), Renovaré, guided imagery, Walk to Emmaus, Cursillo, Centering Prayer, Ignatian Awareness Examen, The Jesus Prayer, and The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius, to name but a handful. Two significant reasons for the appalling growth of these and other similar activities are that 1) they have an inside track with established parachurch organizations, and 2) increasing numbers of evangelicals are acquiring a taste for things Catholic. 

Mark Yaconelli is co-director of the Youth Ministry and Spirituality Project (YMSP), an Eli Lilly (makers of Prozac) endowed program which is introducing contemplative spirituality to young people throughout the country. He is also an adjunct professor of youth ministries at San Francisco Theological Seminary. His father is Mike Yaconelli, head of Youth Specialities, a major evangelical organization serving “more than 80,000 youth workers worldwide through training seminars, conventions, videos, magazines, and resource products.” 

One Youth Specialities seminar is “Sabbath: A [Contemplative] Spiritual Retreat for Youth Workers,” which Mark Yaconelli leads. In an article for the popular, youth-oriented Group magazine, Mark states, “The YMSP approach to youth ministry pushes for a return to God-awareness…[noting] that middle school and senior high kids are hungry to encounter God directly and eager to learn contemplative spiritual practices.”1

In another article subtitled “How Spiritual Exercises Can Change Your Kids,” he tells of implementing contemplative methods he first learned at “a weeklong retreat at a nearby [Roman Catholic] convent”: 

Our [YMSP] project churches were introduced to a number of classical exercises from the Christian tradition: Biblical meditation forms like Lectio Divina and Ignatian contemplation; icon prayers and other visualization prayers; chanting; guided imagery; biblical imagination…centering prayer; and prayers of discernment.2

While I’m not questioning Yaconelli’s sincerity or integrity, nevertheless his statement needs both clarification and correction for accuracy’s sake. By “Christian tradition” he cannot mean biblical Christianity; these are exercises from “ancient” Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions. And, as will become clear, the “biblical meditation forms” he refers to are the antithesis of the meditation presented in God’s Word. 

Let’s begin with the term “contemplative,” which is the prevalent name for the movement. Whereas contemplation normally means to think about something intently or to study it carefully, practitioners of the various contemplative methods do the opposite. The movement’s goal is to get people beyond thinking and understanding and into the realm of experiencing. Adherents are taught that while reason has some value, truly knowing God can only come through experiencing Him. This approach is, at best, a corruption of what the Bible says both about reason and how a believer’s personal relationship with Jesus Christ is developed. At worst, the contemplative exercises lead to the false Eastern mystical belief that man can achieve literal union with God, i.e., be absorbed into Him or It. 

Lectio Divina (or “holy reading”) is one of the basic exercises of these disciplines. A phrase or single word is chosen from the Bible. However, rather than aiding understanding through one’s dwelling on its plain meaning, the word or words become mediumistic devices for hearing directly from God. The word or phrase is then “meditated upon” (meditatio) by being slowly repeated again and again in the fashion of a mantra (Jesus condemns as heathen “vain repetitions” in prayer [Mt 6:7]). It is then prayed (oratio) as an incantation, thereby allegedly healing painful thoughts or emotions. Finally, the repeated word is used to help clear one’s thoughts (contemplatio), supposedly making one an open receptacle for personally hearing God’s voice. 

These biblical words are selected not for the purpose of attaining objective understanding—the “contemplator” has almost no interest in the meaning, grammatical use or context of the verses, which simply become a mechanism to aid in listening for subjective communication from God. It should be obvious (especially for evangelicals!) that this is not how the Bible instructs us to learn or teach the basic doctrines of the Christian faith. Furthermore, classic contemplative concepts reject doctrine as a basis for knowing God and for receiving His salvation. Many of the movement’s “spiritual masters” blame western rationalism (with its penchant for reason and emphasis upon words) for nearly destroying “our ability to intuitively experience our Creator.” 

While the contemplative movement is troubling in its antibiblical philosophies, it is downright alarming in its potential for demon involvement. Its methodologies have been the very stuff of occultism throughout the ages. A tutorial of this movement is The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola, a primer for learning occult visualization (hailed by shamans as the most potent method for contacting spirit entities). In one of dozens of such exercises Ignatius instructs the reader “to picture…Christ our Lord….standing in a lowly place in a great plain about the region of Jerusalem, His appearance beautiful and attractive.”3 Though this may seem innocent, even spiritually gratifying, in reality it’s impossible. No one knows what Jesus looks like. Morever, this is visual idolatry (Ex 20:4-5), and a divination technique that opens the door to demonic spirits. We personally know former Jesuit priests (Ignatius founded the Jesuits) who report that they had been demonized by this method. The real Jesus will not respond, no matter how sincere the practitioner. Through the imagination the visualized Jesus (or any other personage) often takes on a life of its own and brings the practitioner into occult bondage. (See The Seduction of Christianity or Occult Invasion for more information on shamanic visualization.) 

Centering prayer, a foundational contemplative technique, is a “Christianized” version of Eastern mystical meditation. Stripped of its deceptively biblical sounding terminology, it’s no different from that which yogis have practiced for millennia; neither are its occult effects. For example, an instructor in the movement (who mentors two Catholic priests) tells of his recurring problem with his meditation breathing exercise: 

The Spirit would flow into my heart and start burning and I couldn’t get it to stop. The burning would proceed into my lungs and I could not take a deep breath for days, let alone do the breathing exercises….Do not get the idea that I was doing the exercises too forcefully. I wasn’t. It was just that the Spirit had become unleashed and I was encouraging it to flow more forcefully than my nervous system could handle. I sought medical help but the doctor couldn’t find any reason for the problem. How do you tell a doctor that the Spirit has really been rough on you lately and you want to learn how to cope with it?4

Rough “Spirit”? Not the Holy Spirit! Still needing help, he wrote to a renowned Catholic monk, author of many books on contemplative exercises. The reply was revealing though not surprising. “He graciously wrote back explaining that although the end in God is the same….he had not felt the heat or the flowing of the Spirit exactly as I did but that he had read about these experiences when reading of the Kundalini (what [Western] yogis call the fire of the Holy Spirit [Hindus actually call it the “Serpent force!”]) experiences….”Similar “rough” manifestations which wouldn’t go away have been reported at the alleged revivals of Pensacola and Toronto, causing young people and their parents to seek medical counsel. 

If our small, central-Oregon town of Bend is any indication, the pied pipers of this movement are everywhere. Some of our local churches recently had Taizé meetings (repetitive chanting, meditative silences, candlelit rooms, etc.) for their youth. Walk to Emmaus has its local adherents. Richard Foster, who introduced shamanic visualization to evangelicals in his bestselling Celebration of Discipline, came to town with his contemplative spirituality-promoting organization, Renovaré. Its board of reference and speakers have included Jack Hayford, Lloyd John Ogilvie, Don Moomaw, Robert Seiple, David and Karen Mains, Martin Marty, C. Peter Wagner, Ron Sider, J.I. Packer, Calvin Miller, Fr. Henri Nouwen, Ted Engstrom, Fr. Michael Scanlon, Eugene Peterson, John Wimber, and Tony Campolo. 

Not far from here, Eastern mystical guru Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh had his massive ashram/ranch, which the Lord graciously turned over to Young Life, the evangelical parachurch ministry. So it’s grievously ironic that the speaker for their pre-opening leadership conference at the 60,000-plus-acres Wild Horse Canyon complex was former Catholic priest/present Catholic mystic Brennan Manning. His book The Signature of Jesus advances the philosophies and methodologies of the contemplative mystical/New Age pundits. It is Jesus to whom he attributes the occult technique of centering prayer: “The hunger I encounter across the land for silence, solitude, and centering prayer is the Spirit of Christ calling us from the shadows to the deep.”6 His most influential admirers (and promoters among our youth) are some of the biggest names in Christian music, among them the late Rich Mullins, Michael Card, D.C. Talk, and A Ragamuffin Band—named after Manning’s Ragamuffin Gospel (endorsed by Eugene Peterson and Max Lucado). His contemplative and “unconditional love” gospel (see Q&A this issue), however, is not the biblical gospel of salvation; therefore, neither can the Jesus who he claims appears to him be the biblical Jesus. 

The problems with this bogus spiritual approach to God are too many to fit into this brief article. Nevertheless, my prayer is that those youth leaders and pastors involved, or thinking about getting involved, would contemplate (in the biblical sense!) the following: 

Where do you find any of these methods or techniques in the Bible? Did any prophet or apostle, New Testament or Old, practice any of these “spiritual” exercises? No. Then how can these exercises be considered God’s way of knowing Him? 

How much of this movement with its mystical saints and classic works is Catholic, advancing the Catholic way of salvation? Are you interested in having your youth group follow the “check your mind at the door” teachings of St. Ignatius found in his spiritual exercises—such as, “If we wish to proceed securely in all things, we must hold fast to the following principle: What seems to me white, I will believe black if the hierarchical [Roman Catholic] Church so defines”?

Have you ever found the biblical gospel in any of the classic or modern contemplative materials? Could there be any significance in the fact that this movement practically died out after the Reformation, only to be revived today! How does one discern whether or not the God being “heard” through the subjectiveexperiential mode of communication is truly our Lord speaking—especially if the authority and sufficiency of His Word is downplayed, even rejected? 

Finally, if you truly love those young souls whom Christ also loved and for whom He died, will you be a Berean, carefully checking these things in the light of Scripture—for their sake (Acts 20:28)? TBC 


Lectio Divina Exposed

Ye Must Be Born Again!


SBC and Evangelicals seekers shift toward mystical emergent church

SBC and Evangelicals seekers shift toward mystical emergent church

“Christian” leaders that appeared on the church platforms of Saddleback, Willow Creek, Crystal Cathedral and other mega churches told us that a “big shift” was coming in Christianity and it has. This shift has been from following the written word of God to following mystical beliefs. This will eventually split the Evangelicals and their largest denomination.

The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) and other Evangelicals are slowly but surely being led by the seeker friendly gurus toward embracing the postmodern relativistic mystical concepts and leaders of the Emergent Church Movement.

This danger is greater than the division in the ranks of the SBC some years ago when liberals had unduly influenced the SBC leadership. It then took Adrian Rogers and some other conservative leaders to save the denomination from the abyss. This time the division is more insidious because the deception is coming from once strong conservative Bible believing churches that suddenly and subtly are now shifting to conform to the views of the postmodern emergent “Christians” that believe that truth is relative and Eastern and Roman Catholic religious mysticism is knowledge that should be acquired by Evangelicals.

You cannot argue from the scripture with postmodern people because their thoughts and feelings and human rationalizations trump any sound doctrine arguments. In other words, they are the final authority on God or at least humans are. They have in effect made man God because only man can determine what is good and evil. They have fallen into the big lie and the trap of a Devil that they do not even believe in. The concept of any Devil or Hell is not rational to the emergent church. It is just primitive and harmful folklore.

Scripture is no longer the final authority for faith and practice to most that lead the Emergent Movement, and that is why true Christians will have to separate from them. The situation we find ourselves in within the Evangelical Movement happened before on a smaller scale in the Jesus Movement of the 70’s and it will have a similar outcome.

The Jesus Movement was big and growing in California but some wanted esoteric mystical experiences in the services more than the teaching of sound doctrine. The Calvary Chapel Jesus movement split when Chuck Smith insisted that teaching doctrine, the written word of God, be the main focus of their services and not esoteric claims and mystical experiences. Those that disagreed with Smith split off to form the Vineyard movement that became led by John Wimber. The Vineyards are hyper Charismatic/Pentecostal churches and much like Word of Faith churches they went off into esoteric mystical fairyland and produced, laughing, prosperity and healing circuses. TV also spread hyper-Pentecostalism to other Pentecostal denominations. I guess the umbrella name for these hyper-Pentecostals today (if there is one) is now known as the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). Without sound doctrine to guide them, they just get crazier all the time. On the other hand, the Calvary Chapel movement continued to teach through the Bible and most are still very solid biblical churches.

I think there will be a separation from the emergents as well, because once they departed from the word of God, there is no common foundation to stand on. I can’t stand on someone’s feelings, or on the teachings of men who use scripture as only a tool to teach philosophies that came from subjective contemplation and feelings originating in their own mind.

Unfortunately Bible believers are not going to be able to just educate or eradicate the emergents out of the evangelical movement because postmodern relativism has become firmly established; it has gone on too long. Very popular seeker-friendly gurus like Rick Warren, Bill Hybells etc, are endorsing emergent leaders. They are also joining with the NAR leaders.

What the emergents and the NAR have in common is postmodernism, postmillennialism, Dominion Theology and mysticism. They have different views of just how the Church takes over the world for God, but emergents almost all agree that Christendom must unite and take the world for Christ. Depending on the point of view of those that bought into this Dominion Theology, that either means they will once again join with the Roman Catholics, or they will be taking over the Roman Catholic system. That is why some emergent churches have incorporated Roman Catholic type rituals and its mysticism and some even push the writings of Catholic mystics. On the other hand, the NAR disciples think their anointed elite will usurp the Vatican and all leadership within Christendom. All will bow their knee to the anointed spiritual elite and that is how they will unite the Church and the world. They plan on doing it through signs, wonders and conquest (fat chance).

Emergents have already taken over many of our Bible colleges and seminaries and they are now pumping out young ministers made in the emergent image. I would venture to say that most of the young pastor/teachers coming out of Christian schools today are buying into at least some of the writings of emergent church leaders. Any small church getting a  pastor today right out of Bible school will probably get someone who leans toward emergent teaching. I would also venture to say that any large church probably already has one or more emergent clerics or lay leaders subverting the church from within. Once solid Bible teaching churches and head pastors have shown little discernment about the Emergent Church Movement. Many seem to now care only about numbers and being relevant to a postmodern generation, or perhaps they are deceived themselves and have actually converted to the emergent philosophy.

For example: there is the case of Dr. Ed Young who endorsed the teachings of Gary Thomas and even hired him as a leader in his mega church. Here is an excerpt about this from Apprising Ministries (links within were removed).

Gary Thomas’ main point of teaching right now, while promoting his latest book Thirsting for God: Spiritual Refreshment for the Sacred Journey, is encouraging people to read what he calls the “Christian classics.” He’ll tell you himself that these include, for example, the emotionally troubled Carmelite nun Teresa of Avila and her disciple John of the Cross. So Thomas has clearly set aside the Protestant Reformers’ assessments of these Roman Catholic mystics; but remember, Teresa and John were living at the same time as were these Reformers. And also keep in mind that they were actually active in the Counter Reformation movement within the RCC.

In fact, precisely in answer to mystics like these, the Protestant Reformers rightly emphasized that the proper way to approach Christian spirituality was to meet God in His Word, the Bible, one of His prescribed means of grace. However, in order to teach his mystic mythology Thomas has to set aside sola Scriptura along with these apostate Roman Catholic nuns and monks; they don’t mix. You really need to understand that this is all vivid evidence of an egregious infection of epidemic proportions because it quite accurately represents the views of more and more younger evangelicals.

Not only that, but from years of using marred materials from teachers in the Emerging Church, this also serves to further illustrate the awful effects Emergent philosophy is now having within the mainstream of the evangelical community. Sadly, desperate for numbers circa 2000 foolish leaders within once conservative evangelical churches would end up using their own young as spiritual guinea pigs in “alternative” worship services and quite literally bring wolves into Young Adult and Youth ministry sheep pens. And the first thing los lobos did was to separate them away from trust in Holy Scripture.

Bottom line: If Roman Catholic mysticism is now being promoted and recommended so openly in megachurches like 2ndBC and Saddleback Church within the SBC, then we really have a huge problem.

The Woeful Curse Of Lordship Salvation

Lordship Salvation

By David J. Stewart | May 2007 | Updated May 2015

 “But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.” —Romans 4:5

       LORDSHIP SALVATION is the false doctrine that a sinner MUST forsake a sinful lifestyle to be saved. In sharp contrast, the Bible, God’s Word, teaches that a sinner’s faith in Christ alone is sufficient for salvation. We are not saved by trying, but by trusting. Eternal life is a free gift, freely received by faith alone in Christ. I am a strong OPPONENT of Lordship Salvation. In fact, I hate the hellish lie of Lordship Salvation.

A popular website which endorses Lordship Salvation states the following heresy…

If Jesus Christ is not the Lord and Master of your life, He is NOT your Saviour. ALL opponents of this doctrine DENY the Lord Jesus Christ and turn the grace of God into lasciviousness by saying saved people may live just like the world. Many of today’s “soulwinner’s” believe, and preach, that submitting to Jesus as Lord is optional. They say Jesus will be your Saviour while Satan is your Lord. That is not what the Bible says. Only the devil would want you to believe that. The blood of Jesus is so POWERFUL that it will give you a new mind. Read Romans with clear eyeballs and see for yourself.

SOURCE: Lordship Salvation

I would like to make several comments, examining the above individual statements one by one, in the Light of God’s Word. The Word of God is our Sword by which we can easily defeat the two-headed monster of Lordship Salvation

  1. ACCUSATION #1: “If Jesus Christ is not the Lord and Master of your life, He is NOT your Saviour.”

    MY RESPONSE: You can’t support that statement with the Scriptures! Lordship Salvationists interpret the word Lord to mean “Master,” i.e., to surrender to Christ’s will. However, the Biblical word for Lord is quite different, which is always the Greek word KURIOS, meaning “Supreme in Authority.” Hence, to believe on Christ is to trust THE LORD. Every lost sinner who comes to Jesus Christ for salvation is coming the LORD, i.e., to God Almighty, for salvation. You don’t make Jesus Lord, He is Lord. For Lordship Salvationists to make a distinction, and create an entirely new doctrine, which requires a person to make Christ the Master of his life to be saved—is damnable heresy!

  2. ACCUSATION #2: ALL opponents of this doctrine DENY the Lord Jesus Christ and turn the grace of God into lasciviousness by saying saved people may live just like the world.

    MY RESPONSE: That is a horrible lie! Did Abraham deny the Lord, when he simply “believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness” in Genesis 15:6? Not at all? Romans 4:5 plainly states that we are saved WITHOUT WORKS. Abraham was justified solely by faith concerning his salvation. When James speaks of Abraham’s faith beingjustified by works, he was speaking about the incident in Genesis 22 when Abraham offered up Isaac. This was 7 chapters LATER, after Abraham was saved in Genesis 15:6. James speaks of the FRUIT of Abraham’s faith in James 2:21; BUT Paul speaks of the ROOT of Abraham’s faith in Romans 4:3-5. Lordship Salvationists confuse the ROOT of Christian faith with the FRUIT (i.e., evidence) of that faith. To accuse all “opponents” of Lordship Salvation of condoning worldliness and sinful living is unfair. Nothing could be further from the truth. We do not believe that at all. The Bible does not give anyone God’s permission to live in intentional sin (Romans 3:31; 6:15).

    The Bible teaches that if a person is genuinely saved that there should be some evidence (i.e., the “works” spoken of in James 2:18). However, this has nothing to do with salvation itself. Also, you CANNOT mandate such changes for salvation, otherwise you’ve corrupted the Gospel. Please do not misunderstand—You cannot tell how much fuel is in a car’s gas tank by the sound of the horn; and you cannot determine if a person is saved by viewing their lifestyle. James speaks of works seen in the eyes of men, not God. True, a saved person should bring forth works of righteousness in their life, which are evidence of the indwelling Holy Spirit; HOWEVER, just because such works are not readily visible for others to see doesn’t mean they are not saved.Following Jesus Christ is a matter of DISCIPLESHIP, and not SALVATION. Eternal life is a free gift (Romans 5:15; 6:23; Ephesians 2:8-10). Our churches are filled with morally upright people who are still hellbound in their sins and unbelief. Satan’s greatest weapon is to con people into living the Christian life without ever being born-again. Living a consecrated life is not a part of saving-faith. Please read the beautiful words of Dr. John R. Rice exposing the heresy of Lordship Salvation.

    The argument is concerning salvation itself. Lordship Salvationists are woefully ignorant of the Bible. At some point in the past they got upset seeing professed “Christians” living in sin, so they countered the issue by fabricating the heresy of Lordship Salvation; thus, forcing people to forsake their sinful habits in order to be saved. The problem is that God never said that. Lordship Salvation is a false plan of salvation. You can’t force a sinner to forsake his sins by adding it as a requiring for salvation. This is NOT to say that a man can believe on Christ without realizing that he is a GUILTY SINNER (Romans 3:19); however, there is a vast difference between realizing one’s guilt as a sinner, verses actually forsaking the sinful act itself. Please read what Dr. Harry Ironside had to say about BIBLICAL REPENTANCE. Dr. Ironside is 100% correct in his definition of repentance…SOURCE: Except Ye Repent, by Dr. Harry Ironside, chapter 3

  3. Carefully notice that Biblical repentance is NOT forsaking the act of sin, which is impossible for anyone. Nor is it the desire to forsake deliberate sinful bad habits. For anyone to say that a person MUST forsake their sinful behavior to be saved is heresy, because eternal life is a gift, which you simply take. Please read,The Hypocrisy of the Critics of Eternal Security.

    So to clarify. I am an opponent of the Lordship Salvation heresy. I do NOT believe that a believer may live like the world without consequences. Not at all. However, just because believers struggle with sin doesn’t mean they’re not saved (Romans 7:14-25). As believers we are commanded to walk in the Spirit, but carefully notice the Words of Galatians 5:25… “If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.” It is abundantly clear from this Scripture that it is possible to LIVE in Christ’s Spirit (i.e., to be saved), and yet fail to WALK in Christ’s Spirit (i.e., live for the Lord). Do some genuine believers live like the world? Yes, of course; BUT, Hebrews 12:8 tells us the big difference between a worldly heathen and a worldly believer… “But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.” No believer can live in sin and truly be happy. God clearly states in Hebrews 12:8 that He will CHASTISE and SCOURGE the believer. The Holy Spirit will convict a backslider, and that is an important word—backslider (Proverb 14:14). Lordship Salvationists DON’T allow for a Christian to backslide. As far as they’re concerning, a backslidden believer is no believer at all, and that’s not Biblical. The Word of God gives us numerous references to heroes of the faith who backslid into horrible sin (such as king David who committed adultery and murder).

  4. “Repentance is the recognition of my sinnership — the owning before God that I am as vile as He has declared me to be in His holy Word.”
  5. ACCUSATION #3: Many of today’s “soulwinner’s” believe, and preach, that submitting to Jesus as Lord is optional. They say Jesus will be your Saviour while Satan is your Lord. That is not what the Bible says. Only the devil would want you to believe that.

    MY RESPONSE: Again, this flawed mentality leaves absolutely no allowance for a believer to backslide. The author of the preceding quote keeps alleging that Satan is the Lord of anyone who doesn’t commit their life to Christ at the time of salvation, which is extreme and ridiculous to say the least. 1st Peter 2:2 speaks of growing in the milk of the Word. A new believer must be taught and mentored if they are to live for the Lord.

    Like it or not, there is an ongoing raging battle in EVERY believer between the sinful flesh and the Spirit of God (Romans 7:14-25; James 4:1). Even the Apostle Paul said in Romans 7:19, “For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.” Now why would the Apostle Paul DO EVIL if Jesus were his Lord? Hmmm? This Scripture alone proves the ignorance and hypocrisy of the proponents of the Lordship Salvation heresy.

  6. ACCUSATION #4: The blood of Jesus is so POWERFUL that it will give you a new mind. Read Romans with clear eyeballs and see for yourself.

    MY RESPONSE:  Yes, a new mind; but not a new flesh! The Apostle Paul states in Romans 7:24,25… “O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.” Proponents of Lordship Salvation are woefully blinded to the fact that every believer still has to contend with the carnal flesh. Oftentimes, as seen repeatedly from Genesis to Revelation, God’s children falter. Does not Proverb 24:16 declare… “For a just man falleth seven times, and riseth up again: but the wicked shall fall into mischief“? Christians do falter in their faith at times. At best the Christian life is a rollercoaster.

    It was John the Baptist, whom Jesus called the greatest born amongst women (Matthew 11:11), who told his disciples to go ask Jesus… “Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?” (Matthew 11:3). John became so discouraged in prison that he questioned if Jesus were truly the Messiah. What do you think the Lordship Salvationhypocrites would have said about John the Baptist? Lordship Salvationists are the hypocritical religious Pharisees of our time.

    We read in 2nd Timothy 4:10 that Demas forsook Paul, having loved this present world. Yet, we learn in Philemon 1:24 that a few years earlier Demas was a fellow-labourer with the Apostle Paul in his ministry. Demas was saved, but backslidden into the world.

Ironically, the author of the above Lordship Salvation heresies is a fan of David W. Cloud, who is 100% against the damnable false doctrine of Lordship Salvation. David Cloud states…

WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT A PERSON MUST REPENT OF ALL OF HIS OR HER SINS TO BE SAVED. That is certainly not something we teach or lean toward, and that is not something we have ever stated in any article. In fact, I have plainly stated that I do not believe that. It would be impossible to “repent of all your sins.” I have been saved for almost 24 years, and I still have not repented of all my sins!


Note on David Cloud: Although I fully agree with David Cloud’s statements above, buthe does teach his own variation (ANOTHER GOSPEL) of the heresy. Please read, A Dangerous teaching in Fundamentalism.

Biblically Refuting David Cloud’s False Plan Of Salvation

The following excellent information by Dr. Hank Lindstrom (1940-2008) is from the helpful Christian website,GetGodsGift.Org

THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF THE LORDSHIP GOSPEL WITH THE GOSPEL OF GRACE“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”
Galatians 1:8,9

The importance of this question can’t be overestimated in relation to both salvation and sanctification. The message of faith only and the message of commitment of life can’t both be the gospel; therefore, one of them is a false gospel and come under the curse of perverting the gospel or preaching another gospel.

“It is an inexcusable error to confront sinners with problems that concern the Christian life and call upon them to make promises regarding them. An unsaved person is never called upon to surrender himself to God. The saving act is in no instance represented as our ‘giving ourselves to God’; it is, on the contrary, taking His Son as our Savior.” Ryrie, Charles. Balancing the Christian Life. Moody Press, Inc., 1969 (p. 170).

“The second approach finds faith in the gospel alone an ‘easy Believism’ and seeks to add something to faith in order to accomplish salvation. To repent is to ‘change one’s mind,’ and to believe is to remove one’s trust from that in which it has rested and place it in Christ.” Howard, William. “Is Faith Enough to Save?” Bibliotheca Sacra. January-March, 1942 (p.99).

“This kind of faith is not ‘easy believism’. It is not easy to say, ‘I can’t save myself, I must recognize that there is something wrong with me, and I must seek help from someone else.'” Hook, H. Phillip. “A Biblical Definition of Saving Faith.” Bibliotheca Sacra. April-June, 1964 (p. 133, 138).

“Eternal life is free. Discipleship is immeasurably hard. The former is attained by faith alone, the latter by a faith that works… the former brings with it the righteousness of God so that a man is ‘justified freely by his grace’ (Romans 3:24). The latter develops a personal righteousness, based on good deeds, so that a man was also ‘justified by works’ (James 2:24). The former constituted the believer God’s workmanship, the latter fulfilled the wonderful purpose for which he had been created. The former cost man nothing, the latter could cost him everything, including life itself.” Hodges, Zane C. The Hungry Inherit. Moody Press, Inc., 1972 (p. 114, 115).

“There is a vast difference between coming to Jesus for salvation and coming after Jesus for service. Coming to Christ makes one a believer, while coming after Christ makes one a disciple. All believers are not disciples. To become a believer one accepts the invitation of the Gospel, to be a disciple one obeys the challenge to a life of dedicated service and separation. Salvation comes through the sacrifice of Christ; discipleship comes only by sacrifice of self and surrender to His call for devoted service. Salvation is free, but discipleship involves paying the price of a separated walk. Salvation can’t be lost because it depends upon God’s faithfulness, but discipleship can be lost because it depends upon our faithfulness.” DeHaan, M. R. Hebrews. Zondervan Publishing House, 1959 (p. 117).

“For the unregenerate man, repentance is the change of mind whereby he turns from unbelief to faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ.” Post, Roger. “The Meanings of the Words Translated ‘Repent’ and ‘Repentance’ in the New Testament.” Master’s Thesis, Wheaton College, June 1972 (p. 80).

“There are those who, in their zeal to get people to turn from their sinful ways and receive the Lord, almost put repentance on a par with believing… Repentance, as it relates to Christ, means to change our minds about Him, who He is and what He’s done to provide forgiveness and deliverance from our sins. When we place faith in Jesus as having taken our place personally on the cross and borne the penalty due our sins, then we’re automatically repenting, because we couldn’t accept Him in this way without having had to change our minds in some way concerning Him.” Lindsey, Hal. The Liberation of Planet Earth. Zondervan Publishing House, 1974 (p. 136, 137).

“Discipleship is frequently equated with salvation and often erroneously made a condition for becoming a Christian”. Pentecost, J. Dwight. Design for Discipleship. Zondervan Publishing House, 1971 (p. 11).

“Certainly discipleship is a most important aspect of our relation to Christ, but it belongs to the sphere of Christian life rather than entrance upon that life… One does not become a disciple in order to become a Christian, but because he has become a Christian by faith in the Savior, it is fitting that he embark upon a life of discipleship”. Harrison, Everett F. “Must Christ be Lord to Be Savior?-No.” Eternity, September 1959 (p. 14).

“There is no more piously subtle abrogation of the Gospel than to tell a Sinner that he must not only believe in the Savior, but dedicate himself to do God’s will, crown the Savior Lord of his life, etc., etc. Obviously, dedication and service are highly desirable, but they are the privilege and the duty of the saved, never a condition of salvation for the unsaved (cf. Romans 12:1, 2).” Unger, Merrill F. God is Waiting to Meet You. Moody Press, 1975 (p. 117, 118).

“People are sometimes led to believe that there is saving value in some public confession of Christ, or profession of a decision. “With the heart man believeth unto righteousness.” This is salvation. “With the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” This is the voice of the newborn child speaking to and of its father. The only condition on which one may be saved is to believe.” Chafer, Lewis Sperry. Salvation. Dunham Publishing Company, 1917 (p. 46).

Lordship salvation is where someone teaches that there must be a commitment to Christ as Lord of one’s life in order to be saved. Recently there has been a modification of this position to say that willingness to be controlled by the Lord at the time of salvation is all that is required in addition to faith in order to be saved. The message of faith only and the message of faith plus commitment of life can’t both be the gospel; therefore, one of them is a FALSE GOSPEL and comes under the curse of perverting the gospel or preaching another gospel. Galatians 1:8, 9 says, “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you, than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that you have received, let him be accursed.” If only committed people are saved people, then where is there room for carnal Christians? What kind of dedication must be preached to people, if in order to be saved, they have already dedicated their lives to the Lord? Where do you stop if you start adding something else to this which is the gospel revealed in the Bible? Look at what God says about adding to the revelation of Jesus Christ (gospel), “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book (Revelation 22:18).” The Bible plainly declares that we are saved by faith, and not by works. Where does it say this? Ephesians 2:8, 9 “For by grace are ye saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God. Not of works, lest any man should boast.” What are you trusting in to get you to heaven?

* Written by Dr. Hank Lindstrom

The moment you put your trust in Jesus Christ, God who can read your mind knows, saves YOU and gives you the Gift of God, eternal Life.

You do not need anyone to pray over you, or pray for you, because this is between you and God in heaven. Because of your new trust in the shed blood of Jesus Christ you are now a child of God. Before you trusted in Jesus, God was your creator but now and forevermore he will be your father.

You are saved in a moment of time, because you are trusting in the true Savior now, not working your way to heaven day by day which is not even possible.

Once saved you can never be lost, for any reason. This is because you were born spiritually the moment you put your trust in Him. Just like your physical birth which brought you into this human world, your spiritual birth gave you a new spiritual life that is permanent. You were born-again, made righteous and holy in Gods eyes. In fact you have the righteousness of God himself, your are sinless and perfect in God’s eyes now and that’s why you can enter into a perfect heaven.

My favorite saying is:

God will not save anyone who is trying to be saved, He will only save those who are trusting to be saved.

You MUST put ALL your trust in Jesus to be saved, trust in the blood that He shed on the cross, trust that He is God in the flesh, trust that He made the complete payment for your sins, not just part; He paid for ALL of your sins (past, present, and future)! Trust that He rose again from the dead after 3 days and 3 nights, and in return for this trust, He gives YOU Eternal Life. All false Christians put part of their trust in Jesus and part of their trust the Church and part of their trust in themselves. If you put 99.99% trust in Jesus and 00.01% in something else, you will go to hell. It must be 100% trust in Jesus and what He did and 0% in you or your church! This information in critical… (grace always cancels works!) You are going to hell if it’s by your works or you are going to heaven by Gods grace. It’s as simple as that.

So I guess the question comes down to who are you trusting. Are you trusting yourself to get to heaven by being a good person and giving lots of money to your church or are you trusting Jesus, the lamb of God, that was slain for the sins of the world to get you to heaven? You receive the Gift of God (Eternal Life) as soon as you stop trusting in yourself, your church, your synagogue, your mosque, your money, or any other works and put your trust in Him and Him ALONE, Jesus Christ, Yeshua, The King of Kings, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace, the Alpha and Omega, the Mighty God.

False religions are everywhere and they will find you, the one true God and His plan of salvation must be found.

If all this makes sense to you and you would like to trust Jesus as your personal Savior right now then tell the Mighty God in Heaven of your decision to trust Jesus Christ as your only hope of heaven. Tell Him that you are no longer putting your trust in your actions, or your church, or your church membership, or in your money, or in your Rabbi, or in your synagogue or your Mosque but that you are putting all of your trust in Him and the shed blood of the cross to pay your sin debt. Thank Him for doing it for you! Thank Him for giving you the Gift of Eternal Life that He paid for with His life. There is no greater deed than that of laying down your life for another.

Will you trust Jesus as your Savior right now, the one who shed His precious blood on the cross of Calvary to pay for all your sins?

Sinners Prayer
Lord, I admit that I’m a sinner & I don’t understand a whole lot about the bible, but I do believe that Jesus Christ died & paid for my sins in full, by His death & shed blood on the cross. I trust right now the He died for me, was buried & rose again from the dead and will live forever more. I trust Jesus Christ right now to save me, to be my savior, to forgive my sins & to give me the GIFT OF GOD Eternal Life. Amen

By reading this sinners prayer aloud, you are putting your trust in God and His plan of salvation. You are not saved by saying this prayer, you are saved the moment your mind made the switch from trusting in yourself to putting your COMPLETE TRUST IN JESUS CHRIST. That moment may have been five paragraphs up on this page or that moment may have been on another one of our pages. You will not feel any different, but you will be changed and changed for the better forever. Once you have trusted Jesus as your savior and received his gift of eternal life, this gift can NEVER be lost. You can NEVER go to hell for ANY reason. Your past, present and future sins were paid in full the moment you put your trust in Him. You are blameless and Holy in God’s eyes now and FOREVER. If you have eternal life today what kind of life will you have in five years? ETERNAL! What kind of life will you have in ten years? ETERNAL!! What kind of life will you have in 50 years? ETERNAL!!! God does not give probationary life or temporary life, His gift is ETERNAL LIFE! Thanks be to GOD!

Why be good, now that I am assured of going to heaven? Because God’s law of sowing and reaping still applies to you and me. You will reap what you sow. You will reap more than you sow and you will reap later than you sow. If you drink alcohol like a fish, you will reap a diseased liver. If you smoke like a chimney everyday, you will reap lung cancer. If you rob, murder, and steal you will reap a life in prison. You will reap what you sow. I guarantee it! Now that you are saved, when you do good things you WILL be rewarded here on earth and in Heaven. And when you do bad things you WILL lose rewards that God had planned on giving you here on earth and in Heaven. But you will NEVER lose your guarantee of going to heaven. That can never be lost for any reason!! You have God’s word that your salvation can never be lost for any reason. You did not earn salvation and you do not work to keep salvation! Eternal Life, salvation, being born again, becoming a child of God, was, is, and always will be the GIFT OF GOD.

Remember: If your not saved forever… you are not saved!

Why is this true you might ask? Because if a person is not sure that they are saved TODAY / RIGHT NOW it means that they are still trying to be the savior! They can’t be sure they are going to heaven because they don’t know what sin’s they may commit next week, next month or next year. We who have trusted in Jesus alone, can have comfort knowing that all our sins have been paid in full on the Cross of Calvary (past, present, and future sins). Jesus has already died for my sins so I don’t need to pay for any sin I have or will commit in the future because Jesus already paid the price in full with His blood. So called Christians who say that you can lose your salvation because of suicide or murder or falling away from the church don’t have a clue what the Bible says and clearly have not trusted Jesus ALONE!

Biblical Salvation is forsaking any other means of salvation but Christ and casting ourselves fully upon Him for eternal life.

The Gift of God, Eternal Life can never be lost once possessed for any reason. John 6:39 ” And this is the Father’s will which hath sent Me, that of all which He hath given Me I should LOSE NOTHING, but should raise it up again at the last day.” You have God’s promise that once you put your trust in Jesus you can never be lost for ANY reason whatsoever.

“For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance” Romans 11:29 Again, God is telling you that this Gift of God that you have just received is without repentance. He can never take His gift back for any reason, no matter how bad you get, or how bad your sins are it is not possible. God would have to cease to exist for that to happen because He cannot lie.

SOURCE: Lordship Salvation » How to get into Heaven

Are Opponents of Lordship Salvation Antinomians?

Webster’s 1828 dictionary defines an “antinomian” as…

ANTINOMIAN, n. One of a sect who maintain, that, under the gospel dispensation, the law is of no use or obligation; or who hold doctrines which supersede the necessity of good works and a virtuous life. This sect originated with John Agricola about the year 1538.

ANTIMONITE, n. One who pays no regard to the law, or to good works.

ANTINOMIAN, a. [Gr. against, and law.] Against law; pertaining to the Antinomians.

ANTINOMIANISM, n. The tenets of Antinomians.

Are opponents of Lordship Salvation antinomians? No, absolutely not! Opponents of the Lordship Salvation heresy are not Antinomians!


Antinomianism comes from the Greek meaning lawless. In Christian theology it is a pejorative term for the teaching that Christians are under no obligation to obey the laws of ethics or morality. Few, if any, would explicitly call themselves “antinomian,” hence, it is usually a charge leveled by one group against an opposing group.

Antinomianism may be viewed as the polar opposite of legalism, the notion that obedience to a code of religious law is necessary for salvation. In this sense, both antinomianism and legalism are considered errant extremes.

SOURCE: Antinomianism – Theopedia, an encyclopedia of Biblical Christianity

I DON’T AGREE WITH ANTINOMIANISM. It is a false doctrine! I DO believe that Christians are under obligation from God to obey His laws and ethics, BUT NOT AS PART OF THE PLAN OF SALVATION!!!Romans 3:31, “Do we then make void the law through faith? God Forbid: Yea, We Establish the Law.That’s all I’m teaching! Every born-again believer is obligated to obey and fulfil the law, not to be saved, but because we are saved.

Also see Romans 6:15. Although the believer in Christ is freed from the CURSE of the Law, we are nevertheless expected to obey the COMMAND of the Law. Jesus said in John 15:14, “If ye love me, keep my commandments.” No believer has God’s permission to sin. 2nd Corinthians 5:10 plainly states, “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad.

There will be a separate judgment in Heaven just for believers, which proves that a believer cannot lose salvation because of sin. If sinful believers went to Hell, then there would not be any need for a separate judgment for believers who sin. 1st Corinthians 3:15 tells us that some believers will escape Hell “as by fire.” In other words, they will receive no rewards in Heaven. This clearly refutes the Charismatic heresy that salvation can be lost. If that were true, then how could a believer, who lived so awful as to receive NO REWARDS in Heaven, still go to Heaven?

Oh! The folly of those today who propagate the Lordship Salvation heresy. Their accusation against Bible-believing Christians that we make void the Law is absurd and certainly untrue. Just because a Christian goes into sin does not mean that they have chosen Satan as their lord. How ridiculous! Did king David make Satan his lord when he deliberately committed adultery and murder? Did Peter make Satan his lord when he denied Christ? Such accusations are childish. The truth is that every believer struggles with the sin-nature. As my pastor Dr. Jack Hyles used to say… “We can walk in the Spirit at any given moment if we so choose; but we won’t always walk in the Spirit because of our sin-nature.” God has given us the ability to escape temptation (1st Corinthians 10:13); but as sinners we won’t always do that. Lordship Salvationists act like they are without sin, but they are saturated with sins, especially the sin of hypocrisy.

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in him should not perish,
but have everlasting life.”
—John 3:16

Who’s the Biggest Sinner?

The Curse of Lordship Salvation

The Hypocrisy of Lordship Salvation

The Foolish Doctrine of Lordship Salvation

Scriptural Proof that Lordship Salvation is a Lie

Lordship Salvation Ignores Babes in Christ and the Backslidden


The Counterfeit Emerging Church Of Alice Bailey


The Counterfeit Emerging Church Of Alice Bailey

by David J. Stewart | July 2015

2nd Timothy 3:1-5, “This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; HAVING A FORM OF GODLINESS, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.”

The following shocking quote from Alice Bailey ought to alarm every born-again Christian in the world. I’ll explain the Satanic meaning and dark agenda set forth by Mrs. Bailey after you read this disturbing quote…

The Christian church in its many branches can serve as a St. John the Baptist, as a voice crying in the wilderness, and as a nucleus through which world illumination may be accomplished. I indicate the hope. I do not assert a fact. Its work is intended to be the holding of a broad platform. The church must show a wide tolerance, and teach no revolutionary doctrines or cling to any reactionary ideas. The church as a teaching factor should take the great basic doctrines and (shattering the old forms in which they are expressed and held) show their true and inner spiritual significance. The prime work of the church is to teach, and teach ceaselessly, preserving the outer appearance in order to reach the many who are accustomed to church usages. Teachers must be trained; Bible knowledge must be spread; the sacraments must be mystically interpreted, and the power of the church to heal must be demonstrated.

…There is no question therefore that the work to be done in familiarising the general public with the nature of the Mysteries is of paramount importance at this time. These Mysteries will be restored to outer expression through the medium of the Church and the Masonic Fraternity, if those groups leave off being organisations with material purpose, and become organisms with living objectives. [emphasis added]

SOURCE: Alice Bailey, The Externalisation Of The Hierarchy, pp. 510, 514

Let’s break the preceding quote down into a few points, and examine it in light of the Word of God:

Apostate Churches Will Be The Nucleus Through Which The New World Order Is Implemented. Bailey says that modern apostate churches can be just as influential as John the Baptist, who prepared the way for the first appearing of the Lord Jesus Christ. Shockingly, Bailey is teaching that the churches can be infiltrated and corrupted so that they actually help prepare for the coming of the Antichrist. Wow! Apostate Rick Warren (who has a personal net worth of $25,000,000) has been dubbed as “America’s Pastor,” yet he has relentlessly promoted “Chrislam” (Christianity sinfully yoked together with Islam), and has called for all Christians to submit to the Catholic Pope. In essence, and I say this kindly, Pastor Warren is “America’s Bastard” (meaning illegitimate). Illuminati Puppet, Pastor Rick Warren, Calls Jesuit Pedophile Devil Pope Francis, “OUR POPE”! What a fraud! Please watch the video titled: Rick Warren Exposed: Roman Catholic End Time Deception! If you understand what Alice Bailey is saying in the previous quote, you can clearly see how the Devil is using Pastor Warren to reform and corrupt the churches with New World Order philosophies. Warren claims that his book on “The Purpose Driven Life” is second in sales only to the King James Bible itself. I don’t know if that’s true, but that’s what he claims. Warren said his book has been translated into 159 different languages. That is sad and tragic, because his book is a blueprint for Alice Bailey’s New World Order.

These Churches Will Be Ecumenical, Soft-On-Sin, Non-Controversial And Doctrinally Deficient. Bailey states: “The church must show a wide tolerance, and teach no revolutionary doctrines or cling to any reactionary ideas.” This defines Rick Warren’s ecumenical compromise and shameful teachings. Warren’s wishy-washy! Alice Bailey said the churches must refrain from being controversial, by becoming widely “tolerant.” Now you know why in March of 2015, 20,562 Presbyterian ministers sinfully embraced same-sex marriages in 10,083 churches!!! WOE UNTO THOSE CHURCHES!!! The dictionary defines the word “reactionary” as “extremely conservative.” No wonder Rick Warren flip-flops on the issue of homosexuality, apologetically expressing his lame beliefs, telling everyone that he has many gay friends. The word “revolutionary” means “radical.” Bailey said the churches must not teach radical doctrines, such as the truth that salvation is by faith alone!!! The churches are infected today with the false doctrine that a person must forsake a sinful life to be saved, which is 100% works salvation. Reformation is not a requirement for regeneration!!! Amen! Warren is an unsaved spiritual destitute man, who teaches the Lordship Salvation heresy (.pdf book), pulling on the same rope as the Devil. God deliver us from this evil generation!!! Bailey’s plan for the New World Order is being successfully implemented, and the average church leader is woefully ignorant of these things. By God’s grace, I am trying to wake you up!!! Here’s a video clip of reprobate Rick Warren saying concerning Roman Catholics, “If you love Jesus, we’re on the same team.” No, Catholics are on their way to a burning Hell in their sacramental salvation!!! Salvation is by faith, not human effort.

These Churches Will Transform Biblical Theology Into Religious Spirituality. Bailey says, “The church as a teaching factor should take the great basic doctrines and (shattering the old forms in which they are expressed and held) show their true and inner spiritual significance.” Whoa! Alice Bailey said that to usher in the New World Order, the churches should change the fundamental doctrines of Christianity into religious forms that put forth New World Order philosophies instead. This is why many churches today are teaching spirituality without Biblical doctrinal soundness and truth. This is why the senior pastor (Miss Gretta Vosper) of the West Hill United Church in Toronto, Canada is a devout atheist!!! She says it’s more important how we treat each other than what we believe. In April of 2014, Melanie Johnson-Debaufre of United Methodist Drew University Theological School and Robert J. Miller of Juniata College appeared as part of the Jesus Seminar on the Road program. These two liberal theologians spoke at the United Methodist Church in Washington DC, presenting their argument why Jesus DIDN’T bodily raise up from the dead. Literally, the Methodist church advertised and held a Resurrection-Denying Seminar!!! This is The Emerging Church today, the fulfillment of Alice Bailey’s sinister plot to infiltrate the churches and exploit them to achieve a New World Order. I wish I could shake every fool-headed pastor, and wake him up to the horrifying reality that Luciferian-worshipping occultists are behind all modern counterfeit Bible versions!!! Satan is using the new corrupt Bible versions to corrupt and change the churches, transforming them from Biblical churches into Satanic false churches. Please watch the 1:46 hour documentary on the attack against the Word of God, Illuminati Plans 2016: The End Of The World.

These Churches Will Have A Superficial Outer Shell, But Lack True Biblical Christianity. Alice Bailey said, “The prime work of the church is to teach, and teach ceaselessly, preserving the outer appearance in order to reach the many who are accustomed to church usages.” Do you see how evil this reprobate woman was? Bailey is teaching that the church is to be exploited, as a whore, to deceive the masses of society. As you just read in her shocking sinister quote, Bailey says that in order to maintain the illusion of a real church (i.e., preserving the outer appearance), there should be a continuous flow of information. Now you know why these Satanic ministers always have another New York Times Best-Seller being sold in your nearest bookstore. The purpose of the New Testament Church is not to incessantly teach as Bailey claims; but rather, the Church is the Christian’s spiritual family. Church is where we hear preaching to mature in the Lord, get comfort, receive encouragement, tithe and go soul-winning. Church is where we exalt the Savior, evangelize the sinner and edify the saints!!! Please read from the awesome, doctrinally sound book, The Purpose Of Going To Church (by Pastor Jack Hyles, 1926-2001). If your church doesn’t have strong-preaching against sin, you’re in a sick church! If your church doesn’t go soul-winning, your in a sick church! If your church uses modern corrupt Bible versions, and teaches the heresy of Lordship Salvation, your in a religious cult!!! Alice Bailey said that apostate churches should PRESERVE “the outer appearance IN ORDER TO REACH [DECEIVE] THE MANY who are accustomed to church usages.” In other words, make it look like a church, but it’s not a real church!!!

My friend, what you just read by Alice Bailey is a manual on how to infiltrate, corrupt and destroy the churches! It is happening now!!! Our churches are in ruins. Evangelist Billy Sunday saw this horrifying trend a century ago in 1914…

“It would be a godsend if the Church would suffer persecution today; she hasn’t
suffered it for hundreds of years. She is growing rich and lagging behind. Going back.”
SOURCE: Billy Sunday, The Need for Revivals, From “Billy Sunday: The Man and His Message,” by William T. Ellis, Philadelphia: John C. Winston Co., 1914.
The average independent Baptist church has been corrupted, using the corrupted modern Bible PERversions instead of recognizing the faithful King James Bible as God’s preserved very pure Words. Psalms 119:140, “Thy word is very pure: therefore thy servant loveth it.” God promised to preserve those very pure Words unto every generation (Psalms 12:6-7). Every modern counterfeit Bible version completely changes this Scripture passage, saying that God preserves the saints instead. BLASPHEMY!!! Since greedy publishers are wickedly butchering the Word of God, and there are literally hundreds of English versions, they had to remove this promise from God from Psalms 12:6-7. The Devil’s hands have been very busy!

The Antichrist will not promote any certain religion. There will not be a One World Religion; but rather, there will be a watering down and diminishing of the churches, melting them into a one world religious philosophy (yet retaining their superficial denominational identities). Non-denominational churches are becoming very popular. Although there is no such thing as “The Baptist Church” (or any other denomination), I like to identify with Independent Fundamental Baptist (first because I am one), and because it gives people an idea of what core beliefs I hold. I sometimes meet people who refuse to tell me what religion or denomination they best align with, but after a few questions I can usually determine who they are. For example: If a man tells me that he believes salvation can be lost, believes in speaking-in-tongues and healing meetings, then I know he’s caught-up in the Charismatic mess.

This was Alice Bailey’s plan, that is, to retain the outer shell of the church, but hollow out the inside and replace it with the New Age mystery religion of the coming Antichrist. The onslaught of the never-ending slew of new counterfeit Bible versions is Satan’s grand accomplishment over the last century, allowing the Devil’s Illuminati to infiltrate, corrupt and kill the churches. We are witnessing the blurring of the lines between evangelical Christianity and all the religions of the world. This is all necessary for the Devil to ready the world for the appearance of the Antichrist. Rick Warren’s “The Purpose Driven Life” (deception) is a blueprint that would make Alice Bailey very proud. The Devil doesn’t jerk the steering wheel; but rather, he is slowly chipping away at Biblical Christianity, so he can replace it with a global religious philosophy. The new religion of “the God of forces” (Daniel 11:38) is all-inclusive of every religion, except Biblical Christianity!!!

Look in any of the new corrupt Bible versions and you’ll find that they change the first coming of Jesus Christ from “the time of reformation” to “THE NEW ORDER”!!! …

NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION (NIV)—Hebrews 9:10, “They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washings—external regulations applying until the time of the new order.” [emphasis added]

KING JAMES BIBLE (KJB)—Hebrews 9:10, “Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.” [emphasis added]

Clearly they are promoting the New World Order. The 1984 NIV even changed Jesus from the chief cornerstone to “THE CAPSTONE.” Don’t you see my friend how the Devil is changing Jesus into the Antichrist? The NIV 2011 changed it back to cornerstone. The word “Antichrist” doesn’t mean “against Christ”; but rather, “IN PLACE OF” Christ.
In our text verse above, the “power thereof” refers to the Gospel (Good News) of the Lord Jesus Christ. Romans 1:16, “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.” Tragically, the Catholic idea of penance has crept into our churches, and the plethora of modern counterfeit Bible versions have redefined what it means to “repent.” Instead of a simple “change of mind” that compels a person to believe the Gospel to be saved, the churches have adopted the Satanic idea that a person cannot be saved unless they “change their life” away from sin to be saved. That is 100% human effort and a works-based salvation, not the imputed righteousness of God which is solely by faith. Eternal life is a free gift, which is simply received by faith in Christ’s death on the cross for our sins, His burial, and bodily resurrection the third day (1st Corinthians 15:1-4).
Instead, the emerging churches today are becoming mere religious institutions, having a form of godliness without the power of the Gospel. It appears that most churches are being deceived. The heresy of Lordship Salvation is not compatible with the Gospel. Either a person has to change their behavior to be saved or they don’t. It cannot be both (Romans 11:6). The new counterfeit Bibles say you do. Bless God, Jesus changed my life when I got saved, not me! We are living in a woefully Bible illiterate generation! I’m talking about woefully ignorant evangelists and pastors! The culprit is The Emerging Church which is being taught in all forms of media (magazines, internet, radio, books, television, et cetera). Please watch, The Emerging Church: Satanic False Heresy Of The End Times! (awesome preaching by Pastor Charles Lawson). Here’s the same sermon, but preached at a different time by Dr. Lawson, Beware: The Emerging Church Movement (preached June 2, 2013). Thank God for faithful preachers who have not bowed their knee to Baal!!!

I love you my friend in the Lord, whoever you may be. I sincerely mean that, which is why I work and pray night and day for the Lord to help all my web visitors, pleading for God’s Holy Spirit power to work in your heart as my words speak to your mind. I give all the credit and glory to God alone, who gave me this important ministerial work to do. Your life is a book in progress friend, and I thank you for letting me help write that book. 2nd Corinthians 3:2, “Ye are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read of all men.” You are my joy, my treasure in whom I have invested my time and effort since 2002, to lead you closer to Jesus Christ and the King James Bible. HEAR YE HIM!!! It’s all about Jesus!!! We are so close to the Rapture. The end times are here! Look around you! We must work while it is still day, before the night cometh when no man can work. Time is running out quickly. Get busy for God.